Barack Obama is once again circumventing the legislative process in order to push his administration’s unpopular leftist agenda. First, it was illegal immigration, then transgender bathrooms. This time, it’s guns.
Earlier this year, the White House announced new policies for those receiving social security benefits in conjunction with the president’s January 5th executive order on gun ownership. When it was released, few seemed to notice that the order allowed the administration to withhold Second Amendment rights from those who collect social security.
The move makes little logical sense. Social Security beneficiaries have never proven themselves as particularly violent or incapable of gun ownership. Instead, it seems as if this is part of Obama’s larger plan to slowly and surreptitiously restrict gun ownership whenever and wherever possible.
The administration was likely hoping that this slow creep of new regulations would go unnoticed until it was too late to be repealed. Fortunately, the watchful eyes of conservative media caught them in the act.
See Obama’s secret gun ban on the next page:
I seriously doubt that this is true otherwise I would have gotten an alert from the NRA. Did any member of the NRA get an alert?
This applies to those who are mentally incompetent.The same applies to anybody who is mentally incompetent.
BTW.This story isn’t about trying to take away people’s S.S. benefits.That would be republicans.
Donald Will take back America and quash this inane order when he is elected
Marty Albright They can hire protection too if they’re incompetent.
Hoax?
If not, I’m glad that the president doesn’t actually make law. He just enforces it. It would give too much power to one person. So, just ignore him like everyone else does.
Philip McClure Did you even read the story?Oh wait,I forgot that it implies he’s taking away normal people’s guns.
Do you people seriously not know fear mongering when you see it? There is no such Executive Order, it doesn’t exist. Go to the Library of Congress and you will not find it.
SUSPENDS an “unalienable” right????? Excuse me, but where the F in the Constitution does THAT authority exist??????
ASK yourselves, before you go VOTE, do we want more of this ??????