Barack Obama is once again circumventing the legislative process in order to push his administration’s unpopular leftist agenda. First, it was illegal immigration, then transgender bathrooms. This time, it’s guns.
Earlier this year, the White House announced new policies for those receiving social security benefits in conjunction with the president’s January 5th executive order on gun ownership. When it was released, few seemed to notice that the order allowed the administration to withhold Second Amendment rights from those who collect social security.
The move makes little logical sense. Social Security beneficiaries have never proven themselves as particularly violent or incapable of gun ownership. Instead, it seems as if this is part of Obama’s larger plan to slowly and surreptitiously restrict gun ownership whenever and wherever possible.
The administration was likely hoping that this slow creep of new regulations would go unnoticed until it was too late to be repealed. Fortunately, the watchful eyes of conservative media caught them in the act.
See Obama’s secret gun ban on the next page:
Someone ought to take his pen and stick it where the sun don’t shine!! See if he can write upside down.
The first thing the next President (not Hillary) is to undo all the garbage that ugly traitor is shoveling on the citizens that hired him.
He could only wish!!!!!
The only thing is that if a person is receiving ssi for a mental disability that might fall under one of the many stupid ineffective gun control laws passed by a bunch of limped dicks in Washington. This POS will try anything. But wait and see the$#%&!@*Obama the second will try.
Congress is compiled of a bunch if old cronies, who do t want to lose their paychecks, they are so afraid of Obama and the democrats that they no longer have a brain, election time ,time to get rid of them. .
If this is the case, we should be able to opt out of paying into social security, and be able to put it whatever account we want.
No no
Who believes this BS
tHIS IDOT IS AN$#%&!@*
That’s black mail ! We paid into SSI every week for 35 to 45 years . Now , you’ve used the money for other things and to add insult to injury, you say we can’t have our money back unless you surrender your gun? So if I retire at 65, as a senior , I lose the right to protect myself? Why does this sound half baked?