Barack Obama is urging Americans not to make any assumptions about what motivated a man in Louisiana to kill three police officers this week. This is likely because Obama himself indirectly played a role in the murder.
Obama has had two high-profile chances over the course of the past few weeks to condemn Black Lives Matter and the violence they incite. He had the opportunity after five Dallas cops were killed during a Black Lives Matter protest, and he had the opportunity to do so after three more were slain just days later in Baton Rouge.
Instead, the President of the United States championed the movement, and condemned those who spoke too harshly against men who kill cops.
See Obama scold Americans reacting to the Baton Rouge tragedy on the next page:
No we need to give them some JHP therapy, and jail their leaders, You and George Soros.
Rhetoric!
And groomed for his currant position by none other than George Soros and the teachings of Saul Ailensky. He is the devil incarnate, plain and simple, groomed to complete the destruction of the USA.
True or False: What dose she say? Perhaps someone will ask her at the Demo convention?
The Real Hillary Rodham Clinton Exposed
Posted by Leon Puissegur
This needs to be addressed now so everyone will know of this terrible lady’s background – one that is mired in scandal after scandal and none have stuck to her or her husband, Bill Clinton. One has to wonder why this is, and few could ever know just how the scandals have seemed to just fade away. But, like Obama, Hillary Clintonseems to be able to create a scandal and then move on to another one before any time is spent to really investigate the first.
Now, let us supply what background we can in as short an article as possible.
Let us begin with her birthplace, Park Ridge, Illinois—she was born in Chicago. Why does that sound familiar? Maybe because, in recent times, it seems that a lot of Communist/Socialists have come from that area. Anyway, she left there to go to Massachusetts at Wellesley College where her political vies would change to Democrat, or maybe a more modern term of Socialist/Communist. Her views would move to the extreme left after reading an article titled, “Change or Containment,” authored by one Carl Oglesby, who was a Marxist/Maoist theoretician and the leader of Students for a Democratic Society. In this article he defended Ho Chi Min, Fidel Castro, and the Maoist acts of violence. Hillary said that the article was instrumental to her moving from a Goldwater Republican to an extreme left Democrat (it should be mentioned that this type of Democrat identifies themselves with words such as “progressive” or “left,” but seldom with their true identity, “Communist/Socialist”). She even told a reporter that she still held respect for the Oglesby article, she made that statement in her first year of being First Lady, thus expression her true Socialist/Communist ideology. But this is only the tip of the proverbial Iceberg.
In our previous article, we show the following:
“Hillary Clinton is a lady many despise and many love. But just what does anyone know about her background and how it relates to the United States? Her background has some really radical people in it, and one particular individual is none other than Saul Alinsky. Now, many have to wonder just who is this Saul Alinsky? Now we do have to give a brief background on him, since it is his ideology that Hillary Clinton grew up loving. The first thing we have to present is his famous book, “Rules For Radicals,” of which Hillary even wrote a letter to him asking when it would be out, as she so lightly stated in her letter to Saul Alinsky, dated July 8, 1971.
“Dear Saul,
When is that new book coming out—or has it come out and I somehow missed the fulfillment of Revelation? I have just had my one-thousandth conversation aboutReveille and need some new material to throw at people. You are being rediscovered again as the New Left-type politicos are finally beginning to think seriously about the hard work and mechanics of organizing. I seem to have survived law school, alightly bruised, with my belief and zest for organizing intact. If I never thanked you for the encouraging words of last spring in the midst of the Yale-Columbia madness, I do so now. The more I’ve seen places like Yale Law School and the people who haunt them, the more I am convinced I am that we have the serious business and joy of such work ahead, –if the commitment to a free and open society is ever going to mean more than eloquence and frustration.
I miss our biennial conversations. Do you ever make it out to California? I am living in Berkeley and working in Oakland for the summer and would love to see you. Let me know if there is any chance of our getting together—2667 Derby #2, Berkeley 415-841-5330.”
(See the entire letter)
Let us inform you of just who this Saul Alinsky is that Hillary Clinton is trying to meet in California. We will make this brief, since including Saul Alinsky’s history and how it goes against the Constitution would take up many pages, which we will do in a book soon.
Saul Alinsky was born to Russian-Jewish parents in Chicago in 1909, Saul Alinsky was a Communist/Marxist fellow-traveler who helped establish the tactics of infiltration — coupled with a measure of confrontation — that have been central to revolutionary political movements in the United States in recent decades. He never joined the Communist Party, but instead, as David Horowitz puts it, became an avatar of the post-modern left.
Saul Alinsky has been identified as such:
Identified a set of very specific rules that ordinary citizens could follow, and tactics that ordinary citizens could employ, as a means of gaining public power
Created a blueprint for revolution under the banner of “social change”
Two of his most notable modern-day disciples are Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.
As Alinsky put it: “A reformation means that the masses of our people have reached the point of disillusionment with past ways and values. They don’t know what will work but they do know that the prevailing system is self-defeating, frustrating, and hopeless. They won’t act for change but won’t strongly oppose those who do. The time is then ripe for revolution.”[1]
[1] Saul Alinsky, Rules for Radicals (New York: Vintage Books), March 1972 edition, p. xxii. (Original publication was in 1971.)
(See also)
Now, with her letter, part of which is shown above from the site, we could ask just what type of person Hillary Clinton is. It would seem to show that she is a closet Socialist/Communist at best, or maybe an individual who has the same type of “Rules For Radicals” in her head to toss out upon the people of the United States. Much could be stated about what Hillary Clinton may plan to do, should she win the 2016 Presidential election, but one thing is for sure: her idea of the United States is not the same as the honest, working citizen’s. Her ideas are lined with dreams of an “Alinsky” style of not just government, but nation—one that has the Constitution trampled upon.
Obama is doing ALL of the inflammatory rhetoric himself.
Maybe it’s time to remove the secret service from this man and let local cops start doing it ? Just a thought. I think that will shut him up
If Farrakhan and the likes of him can say all white people must be killed, then we can also say all blacks must be collected and sent back to where their ancestors came from, so they can enjoy their all black society! But the problem here is, White people know there are a great many really decent blacks, that are just as disgusted with this racial c**p, as we are. So what do we do? Eliminate the source of the problem: people like Obama, Sharpton, Jackson, Farrakhan and Hillary and the rest of them who are hell bent on creating problems, and put the away where they can no longer harm anyone but themselves. Solitary confinement, at least, and the firing squad for the traitors they are at best.
Then you should just SHUT UP
WE DO NOT NEED YOU EITHER, BUT WE ARE STILL STUCK WITH YOU FOR NOW !!!! MARIAN.
William Potter True or False: What dose she say? Perhaps someone will ask her at the Demo convention?
The Real Hillary Rodham Clinton Exposed Posted by Leon Puissegur:
This needs to be addressed now so everyone will know of this terrible lady’s background – one that is mired in scandal after scandal and none have stuck to her or her husband, Bill Clinton. One has to wonder why this is, and few could ever know just how the scandals have seemed to just fade away. But, like Obama, Hillary Clintonseems to be able to create a scandal and then move on to another one before any time is spent to really investigate the first.
Now, let us supply what background we can in as short an article as possible.
Let us begin with her birthplace, Park Ridge, Illinois—she was born in Chicago. Why does that sound familiar? Maybe because, in recent times, it seems that a lot of Communist/Socialists have come from that area. Anyway, she left there to go to Massachusetts at Wellesley College where her political vies would change to Democrat, or maybe a more modern term of Socialist/Communist. Her views would move to the extreme left after reading an article titled, “Change or Containment,” authored by one Carl Oglesby, who was a Marxist/Maoist theoretician and the leader of Students for a Democratic Society. In this article he defended Ho Chi Min, Fidel Castro, and the Maoist acts of violence. Hillary said that the article was instrumental to her moving from a Goldwater Republican to an extreme left Democrat (it should be mentioned that this type of Democrat identifies themselves with words such as “progressive” or “left,” but seldom with their true identity, “Communist/Socialist”). She even told a reporter that she still held respect for the Oglesby article, she made that statement in her first year of being First Lady, thus expression her true Socialist/Communist ideology. But this is only the tip of the proverbial Iceberg.
In our previous article, we show the following:
“Hillary Clinton is a lady many despise and many love. But just what does anyone know about her background and how it relates to the United States? Her background has some really radical people in it, and one particular individual is none other than Saul Alinsky. Now, many have to wonder just who is this Saul Alinsky? Now we do have to give a brief background on him, since it is his ideology that Hillary Clinton grew up loving. The first thing we have to present is his famous book, “Rules For Radicals,” of which Hillary even wrote a letter to him asking when it would be out, as she so lightly stated in her letter to Saul Alinsky, dated July 8, 1971.
“Dear Saul,
When is that new book coming out—or has it come out and I somehow missed the fulfillment of Revelation? I have just had my one-thousandth conversation aboutReveille and need some new material to throw at people. You are being rediscovered again as the New Left-type politicos are finally beginning to think seriously about the hard work and mechanics of organizing. I seem to have survived law school, alightly bruised, with my belief and zest for organizing intact. If I never thanked you for the encouraging words of last spring in the midst of the Yale-Columbia madness, I do so now. The more I’ve seen places like Yale Law School and the people who haunt them, the more I am convinced I am that we have the serious business and joy of such work ahead, –if the commitment to a free and open society is ever going to mean more than eloquence and frustration.
I miss our biennial conversations. Do you ever make it out to California? I am living in Berkeley and working in Oakland for the summer and would love to see you. Let me know if there is any chance of our getting together—2667 Derby #2, Berkeley 415-841-5330.”
(See the entire letter)
Let us inform you of just who this Saul Alinsky is that Hillary Clinton is trying to meet in California. We will make this brief, since including Saul Alinsky’s history and how it goes against the Constitution would take up many pages, which we will do in a book soon.
Saul Alinsky was born to Russian-Jewish parents in Chicago in 1909, Saul Alinsky was a Communist/Marxist fellow-traveler who helped establish the tactics of infiltration — coupled with a measure of confrontation — that have been central to revolutionary political movements in the United States in recent decades. He never joined the Communist Party, but instead, as David Horowitz puts it, became an avatar of the post-modern left.
Saul Alinsky has been identified as such:
Identified a set of very specific rules that ordinary citizens could follow, and tactics that ordinary citizens could employ, as a means of gaining public power
Created a blueprint for revolution under the banner of “social change”
Two of his most notable modern-day disciples are Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.
As Alinsky put it: “A reformation means that the masses of our people have reached the point of disillusionment with past ways and values. They don’t know what will work but they do know that the prevailing system is self-defeating, frustrating, and hopeless. They won’t act for change but won’t strongly oppose those who do. The time is then ripe for revolution.”[1]
[1] Saul Alinsky, Rules for Radicals (New York: Vintage Books), March 1972 edition, p. xxii. (Original publication was in 1971.)
(See also)
Now, with her letter, part of which is shown above from the site, we could ask just what type of person Hillary Clinton is. It would seem to show that she is a closet Socialist/Communist at best, or maybe an individual who has the same type of “Rules For Radicals” in her head to toss out upon the people of the United States. Much could be stated about what Hillary Clinton may plan to do, should she win the 2016 Presidential election, but one thing is for sure: her idea of the United States is not the same as the honest, working citizen’s. Her ideas are lined with dreams of an “Alinsky” style of not just government, but nation—one that has the Constitution trampled upon.