The Bible, the U.S. Constitution and the Declaration of Independence are all sexist, according to a course approved by the Defense Department.
In yet another assault on the fabric of our nation, these foundational documents are to blame for “historical influences that allow sexism to continue,” as stated in a presentation by the Defense Equal Opportunity Management Institute, a Department of Defense school out of Florida.
These wild interpretations are really jaw-dropping!
Check out the details and skewed logic of the ‘Sexism Course’ and ‘Discrimination Course,’ at thelink:
OMG, the 20th can’t come soon enough..
Boy talk about calling the kettle black. Obambinlyin is the most racist Trojan Horse of all time.
How did those people next to him, keep a straight face???
He’s married. His marraige vows are sexist. What a fricking dope.
Kind of funny that all of those things have to do with our rights???
Let’s see him stand before the Lord of Lords & tell Him that!
You braintrusts need to wake up to the fact these were all written in the vernacular of the day, without intent of being sexist by the liberal standards of today. Perhaps if you would have spent more time focusing on the credible intent of any of these documents rather than an exorbitant amount of time highlighting their perceived shortfalls and built upon there strengths rather than weaknesses the current administration would have found greater support and success.
In reviewing old documents it is important to understand that it can never mean what it never meant. In other words, applying today’s definition of words or phrases will result in a misunderstanding of the document. For instance, the phrase “well regulated” in reference to the second amendment does not mean that there are rules written by the government, the term at the time meant “well trained”. The intent was not to have the government write rules later to decide on the size, structure or operations of a militia, it was a very clear statement that those who were part of the militia would understand how to use their weapons effectively. So for an administration to look back at the language of documents and apply today’s language is at best disingenuous, and at worst an outright attempt to subjugate the intended rule of law. Not at all surprising considering who we are talking about, a community agitator who has never held a position that required actual production or success.
s an example, back in the 50s if you were going to step outside and “blow a f*g” it did not mean that you were going to perform oral sex on a homosexual, it meant you were going to smoke a cigarette. Can you see how context matters Barry?
He’s stupid don’t listen to him cry anymore he’s history anyway!