The Bible, the U.S. Constitution and the Declaration of Independence are all sexist, according to a course approved by the Defense Department.
In yet another assault on the fabric of our nation, these foundational documents are to blame for “historical influences that allow sexism to continue,” as stated in a presentation by the Defense Equal Opportunity Management Institute, a Department of Defense school out of Florida.
These wild interpretations are really jaw-dropping!
Check out the details and skewed logic of the ‘Sexism Course’ and ‘Discrimination Course,’ at thelink:
And you are a horses ads Obama that’s history so suck it up MORON
They are playing with eternity and they will lose!
Be gone you all! So sick of your hatred, vitriole of our country
So sad to see him go!!!!!!
Man. He just likes slapping a label on everything.
I mean the Bible is just a fictional fairy tale and carries no weight in this country
I believe and truly believe that if we take time at least 30 sec of our prayers we will change this country. We’re too focus on Only One man, which I think is a political view of things. God has the last word in anyone life. So, if God does not build it’s in vain that we the people are building. Love God, go back to him and America will stands Greater and Greater because God is always GGGRRREEEAAATTTEEERRR
The thief does not come except to steal, and to kill, and to destroy.. I have come that they may have life, and that they may have it more abundantly.. John: 10,10.
There’s your answer with the intent on Obama’s agenda!!!
Are you really arguing that documents that clearly didn’t consider women equal to men are not sexist? They are important and foundational but that doesn’t prevent them from being sexist. Most, if not all, historical documents are because the people writing and sharing them were – some because it never occurred to them that things should be different and others because they definitely did not want it to be different.
Robert Page and that has to do with what? The arguments at the time were either that woman was too good or pure to be sullied by politics or too emotional to be trusted with property or decisions. Neither argument holds up.