The New York Times has been a dishonest and blatant mouthpiece for the Left for many years. That includes a strong distaste for the Constitution, free enterprise, national pride and patriotism, and the idea of America in general. Most of their writers fancy themselves as “objective citizens of the world,” while anyone who expresses love for country, family, and freedom is considered an uneducated, backwards boob. It was therefore not surprising to read an article in the Times written by Parag Khanna, a self-described “global strategist” who aligns himself with the Council on Foreign Relations, who suggested that the structure and design of America is outdated and unnecessary.
His ideas include the proposal that operating with 50 somewhat independent states makes no sense and they should be done away with. In fact, the idea of national boundaries and unity is also a bad idea and limits the progress that could be made in a more centrally planned, top down structure. Where have we heard that before? Both the Soviet Union and China have tried a similar construct and have been dismal failures.
Read more about Khanna’s plan on page 2:
The real problem is that it will be done subtly little by little a law here a law there and executive order here and executive order Rhee. And one day you will wake up and ir will in fact be on us
Ww3 is coming
They just get dumber every day and liberals be like boy is he smart!!
nope, does the guy in the pic look like a$#%&!@*
Never
One world order
Another foriegnor trying to change America for themselves
Go to China you stupid$#%&!@* and leave the USA alone.
dont think so mo fo…one world order and america..we the ppl will not go quietly…we will win..
Randy two googles. 1. Pentagon Directive 3025-18. And executive order 11921. Both are worthy of a few F words )