Democrat judges have once again interjected partisan politics into the voting process. The recent tendency to broaden the number of days when people can vote to ridiculous spans, to allow same-day registration, and to permit out-of-precinct voting are all excellent techniques to encourage voter fraud. The biggest Democratic scheme, however, is to insist that no one should have to show a photo ID to vote. That may have been appropriate when precinct captains knew the people living in their precinct and when the nation was not overwhelmed with non-citizens, but it is sheer madness today.
The Democrat party, however, is determined to steal elections where they cannot win the hearts and minds of the people. A federal appeals court of three Democrat judges has declared that the North Caroline voter identification law is discriminatory against primarily black individuals by requiring photo ID.
So the party of slavery and the Ku Klux Klan is trying to make it up to African Americans by making sure these individuals can vote whether they are qualified to vote or not. And they do vote for Democrats at a rate of about 90%, so it is clear what the objective of the judges is.
See page 2 for more legal shenanigans:
Obama Invites 18.7 Mi llion Immigrants to Avoid Oath of Allegiance, Pledge to Defend America
It’s not only illegal aliens who are escaping enforcement of the nation’s immigration laws.
Under the Obama administration’s expansive interpretation of executive authority, legal immigrants seeking citizenship through the nation’s Naturalization process are now exempt from a key part of the Oath of Allegiance.
Immigrants seeking to become citizens no longer have to pledge to “bear arms on behalf of the United States.” They can opt out of that part of the Oath. Nor do they have to cite any specific religious belief that forbids them to perform military service.
According to the Naturalization Fact Sheet on the US Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) website, In the fiscal year ending June 30, 2015, the nation welcomed 729,995 Legal Permanent Residents into full citizenship.
• Over the past decade 6.6 million have been naturalized through a process that ends with the Oath of Allegiance.
• In the decade 1980-1990, the average number completing Naturalization was only 220,000 annually, but from 1990 to 2000 that number jumped to over 500,000 annually.
• 1,050,399 new citizens were welcomed in the year 2008.
• 18.7 million immigrants are eligible to eventually become citizens, and 8.8 million already meet the 5-year residency requirement.
The pledge to help defend America was good enough for the 6.6 million immigrants naturalized since 2005 and good enough for the over 15 million naturalized since 1980, but Obama’s appointees at the USCIS think that is too much to ask of the 18.7 million estimated legal immigrants eligible today for eventual naturalization or the 750,000 who will be naturalized in the coming year.
This radical change was announced a year ago, in July of 2015. Congress did not enact the change in new legislation. There was no congressional debate, no filibuster in the US Senate, and no sit-in in the House to demand that a bill to repeal the USCIS action be brought to a vote.
No, this radical change was implemented while Congress slept. Like other Obama actions to undermine our immigration laws, the Republican-controlled Congress has not used its constitutional powers to reverse the administrative action. Thank God many states are stepping up to fill that void.
This week, the US Supreme Court let stand a federal district court ruling invalidating Obama’s unconstitutional “DAPA” amnesty.
By a 4-4 tie vote, the Supreme Court declined to review the Circuit Court’s ruling upholding the Houston district court decision. Therefore, it is now the law and Obama’s DAPA amnesty is voided. If Justice Scalia were still alive and participating in the case, it would have been a 5-4 ruling because the “swing vote,” Associate Justice Kennedy, voted with Justices Alito, Roberts and Thomas.
Where was Congress? Why did it take a lawsuit by the Governors and Attorneys General of 26 states to overturn Obama’s unconstitutional actions?
It’s true that other Presidents have made changes in the Naturalization process by administrative decree and without congressional approval. In 2002, in the wake of the 9-11 terrorist attack, President George Bush by executive order expedited the naturalization process for 89,000 immigrants serving in the armed forces. While many will agree with Bush’s action and even applaud, that change should have been done by act of Congress, not a presidential executive order.
In fact, most Americans will think it extremely odd that the USCIS action with regard to the Oath of Allegiance is not illegal. But the fact is, unelected bureaucrats at the USCIS can change the wording of the Oath without approval of the people’s representatives in Congress. Strange as it sounds, the law as it stands today allows USCIS bureaucrats great leeway in managing the Naturalization process, so Obama’s actions will not be challenged in federal court.
Yet, in view of Obama’s actions, why doesn’t Congress change the law and take control of the Oath of Allegiance? So far, there is no indication that the Republican leadership will do so. If they won’t even bar Islamic terrorists from the refugee program, why should we expect them to protect the Oath of Allegiance? Some members of Congress will grumble, make speeches and issue press releases, but the Republican leadership will do nothing.
Such is the state of the nation as we approach this 240th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence. Some Americans see great irony in the British declaring their independence from the tyranny of Brussels while Americans quietly accept the new tyranny of WDC.
Catholics and Lutherans, they’re in on it! All the major religions are involved in the resettlement. There
are 9 main major refugee resettlement organizations (Volags from
“Voluntary Agency”) with approximately 450 affiliated organization throughout the country; many are run by former refugees. Below are the 9
Volags that operate today:
US Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB),
Lutheran Immigrant Aid Society (LIRS),
International Rescue Committee (IRC),
World Relief Corporation,
Immigrant and Refugee Services of America (IRSA),
Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS),
Church World Service (CWS),
Domestic and Foreign Missionary Service of the Episcopal Church of the USA,
Ethiopian Community Development Center (ECDC),
Below are some of the sources of income for Volags:
a. $1,850 per refugee (including children) from the State Department.
b. Up to $2,200 for each refugee by participating in a U.S. DHHS program known as Matching Grant. To get the $2,200, the Volag need only show i spent $200 and gave away $800 worth of donated clothes, furniture or cars.
c. The Volag pockets 25% of every transportation loan it collects from refugees it “sponsors”.
d. All Volag expenses and overhead in the Washington, DC HQ are paid by the U.S. government.
e. For their refugee programs, Volags collect money from all federal grant programs – “Marriage Initiative”, “Faith-based”,
“Ownership Society”, etc., as well as from various state and local grants.
The program is so lucrative that in some towns the Catholic Church has lessened support for traditional charity works to put more effort in resettlement. It uses collection offerings to promote the refugee resettlement program. https://refugeeresettlementwat…
72 House Democrats ask Obama to take in 100,000 Syrian refugees
A letter was sent to President Obama by 72 House Democrats on Friday asking the President to increase the amount of Syrian refugees the U.S. is taking in to 100,000.
They said that America has not done enough to resettle Syrians displaced by their civil war.
“The number of Syrian refugees that the United States has resettled since the start of the conflict- approximately 1,500- is insufficient in light of the current crisis,” the letter stated. Syrian refugees have positive views toward ISIS While they were pleased the president was increasing the number to 10,000, they thought that number was still too small especially considering the millions that Lebanon, Turkey, and Jordan have taken in. The letter, spearheaded by Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I.), failed to mention that the gulf states like Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia have not taken in a single refugee. This is despite the fact that they speak the same language, in the same region, and a majority share the same faith. “It is our moral duty, as a nation founded on the principles of equality and freedom, to do what we can to assist our brethren who are in desperate turmoil, and are searching for the slightest gesture of goodwill,” the letter concluded. The U.S. already takes in 70% of the world’s refugees. Only Democrats would find logic in emptying Syria of the “moderate Muslims” and leave for extremists and ISIS.
ABSOLUTLY
The Democrates want to RIG the national election like they did the Democratic primary.
If people are so dumb that they can’t obtain ID Then I say they are too stupid to vote.Voter ID will cut down on VOTER FRAUD
Judges like this have to be removed! They say non- partisan on the ballot! Yeah right! They should have to say which party they are affiliated with when they are elected by the people! All judges should be voted in not chosen.
if you cheat you will get caught and i dont want to know what the voters will do to you
Still don’t understand the big deal of having to show an ID.
Part of the Democrat plan for election fraud
That is why all state need a voter ID law.
The constitution states, U.S. citizens vote for federal offices.