New Hampshire state Rep. Michael Cahill (D) once asked of his fellow lawmakers that if the budget isn’t going include people with disabilities, then why not euthanize them.
“Since we are refusing to raise revenues to fund needed programs, to fund services to disabled, for example, have you looked at euthanasia?” asked Cahill during a debate on the budget on Wednesday.
He was quickly called out by House Speaker Shawn Jasper, who stated that his comments were “inappropriate.”
Cahill later apologized for using a ‘poor choice of words.’
Dang!
Well the democrat criminal class already demands to kill babies and are trying to add babies that have been born alive ! So you know what follows, the less than perfect children ! Then the old because they are no longer productive and they are in the way ! Anything that’s sick or infirm !But no worries they will just import all the unwanted garbage from all the other countries in the world to replace your child ,brother ,sister mother , father or grand parents !
How about we start with this assclown !
Debra Jordan Are you volunteering to be first ?
So did$#%&!@*
I think maybe this is being misinterpreted. Perhaps he meant they were taking away funding for the disabled of which maybe he disapproved and sarcastically asked about euthanasia. I hope he meant it this way. I hate to think someone is that cold hearted. I have a disabled son.
That, and maybe also he was trying to shock them into rethinking what they were doing.
How stupid
He was probably saying that instead of saying that to cut of funds for the disabled you might as well kill them. Cutting off funds for the disabled and/or elderly is just a slow death for them.
This is about New Hampshire! Catch up , Granny!