New Hampshire state Rep. Michael Cahill (D) once asked of his fellow lawmakers that if the budget isn’t going include people with disabilities, then why not euthanize them.
“Since we are refusing to raise revenues to fund needed programs, to fund services to disabled, for example, have you looked at euthanasia?” asked Cahill during a debate on the budget on Wednesday.
He was quickly called out by House Speaker Shawn Jasper, who stated that his comments were “inappropriate.”
Cahill later apologized for using a ‘poor choice of words.’
COMMUNIST
I think the guy meant , that if they weren’t going to take better care of the disabled..then it would probably be less cruel to euthanize them ..not that I am defending such a statement ..i wasn’t there to see the context of his wording ..but recently I’ve read of a few people making statements like this one ..if he meant like it sounded God help us all !
He is NO BETTER than the Commies in Russia where they did the same thing ,AND under$#%&!@*too GET this gut out of the place,OUT of the sight of all humans,maybe even send HIM to Terminal Iland!!!!?
Trump all the way for the USA!
Just wondering, what would be a more appropriate word to use?
No it includes all these refugees but not disabled
Spare us from people like him. Euthanasia another nice word for kill him.
It’s funny Obama keeps giving million to others instead of helping out the sick, disabled, veterans, and seniors on social security.
Euthanasia is just a nice way of saying kill them all. Hopefully it never comes to that.
THIS IS TERRIBLE. NO AMERICAN WOULD DO THIS. THIS MAN IS FOR MURDERING PEOPLE THAT ARE DISABLED.