Barack Obama is in his last year as president. He has declared that his effort to “remake” this country means he will try his utmost to implement his most draconian and outrageous goals, one of which is the disarming of America. There is no other way to describe it, and Democratic lawmakers have bought into this absolutely unconstitutional objective, in spite of the objection of their constituents and their declaration to uphold the laws of the land when they were sworn into office.
They have worked hard to indoctrinate children in public schools to believe that guns are “evil,” and that somehow protecting ones life, family and property is unacceptable and improper. They have garbled the language to convince the uninformed that certain types of guns with benign, decorative features are equivalent to military weapons which must be excised from public ownership. Make no mistake, the ultimate goal of the Left is to completely disarm America, an aim the founding fathers adamantly opposed as a sure path leading to tyranny by the government elite.
The attempts to date have been less overt, but still chilling. Government “watch lists” prohibiting gun ownership have been created, with no accountability for how one ends up on such a list, and an impossible bureaucratic mess to be removed from it. The federal government has pushed banks to stop making loans to licensed gun dealers in order to make it impossible to run a retail gun business. And the perpetual call for more invasive and comprehensive “background checks” has been proposed, ensuring that when the government decides to round up all the guns, they will simply check their list and pay a visit to the homes of gun owners.
Super strict gun laws coming, page 2:
Let’s hope that all the Democrats who signed this are the first thru the door in the stack.
fucking idiots
Hlau Hawj i hope this is f**e..
I went to the ghetto last night because my girl got a flat while heading to get on thruway..believe me if the thugs that were surrounding us while I was fixing the flat thought for one second I didn’t have a gun we would have gotten attacked..that’s a fact..
Simple solution. Vote the assholes out of office that support all this bs. If u dnt vote dnt complain.
Complete BS “The federal government has pushed banks to stop making loans to licensed gun dealers in order to make it impossible to run a retail gun business.” First off… if you’ve got a thriving biz, it’s not necessary to borrow ANY MONEY in order to restock inventory. DUH! Second… but more importantly, Banks launder money for drug lords, the mob, crash the economy… no consequences. They own more folks on Capitol hill than the NRA does.
The lies never stop and the half-wits still believe them.
most of you all will take it
There are right, and there are privileges, and there is license. License is when you take a right or privilege and overplay it to the point of absurdity and incivility. To take a non-gun-related eample, Martin Shkreli was within his rights to raise the price on the drug his company sold. To raise it so outrageously was an example of license; he did it because he COULD do it, and his action was intended as a deliberate affront to his clients and thoughtful eople everywhere.
You have a RIGHT to own guns. When you parade around with semi-automatic weapons slung over your shoulder, just because you can, that is an act of license; you are overplaying your right to bear arms in order to intimidate and insult people who disagree with you. Open carriers who indulge in that kind of flagrant display are daring the government to do something about it. They are looking for a fight where previously there was no issue. THEY ARE IN THE WRONG. When you oppose all common sense regulations on guns, simply for the sake of doing so, you are in the wrong. The result is going to be that the government is going to take you up on your dare, and indeed take away your guns… because you are unwilling to make reasonable accommodations to other people’s rights and sensibilities.
Incidentally, one of the central misconceptions of the gun rights movement is the idea that the Second Amendment exists as a guarantee of the right to rebel against an oppressive central government. This idea was actually put to the test during the early years of the Republic, when backwoodsmen of Pennsylvania objected to an unpopular Federal tax on whisky. The Whisky Rebellion was an example of precisely the grass roots armed response to Federal “overreach” envisioned by today’s Tea Party. The result was that the President of the United States, George Washington himself, led a Federal army to put down the revolt.
The Second Amendment exists solely in response to early conditions in the Republic when even the most settled areas weren’t that far from the frontier and hostile Indians, British or French might reasonably be expected to emerge from the woods and attack American interests. Your guns rights exist because the Founders found it advisable to ensure that citizens who might be called upon to repel a hostile foreign attack have easy access to guns, not because gun ownership conferred special privileges on the populace to oppose the government. That’s what elections are for.
They can kiss my white$#%&!@* #BLACKRIFLESMATTER