Barack Obama is in his last year as president. He has declared that his effort to “remake” this country means he will try his utmost to implement his most draconian and outrageous goals, one of which is the disarming of America. There is no other way to describe it, and Democratic lawmakers have bought into this absolutely unconstitutional objective, in spite of the objection of their constituents and their declaration to uphold the laws of the land when they were sworn into office.
They have worked hard to indoctrinate children in public schools to believe that guns are “evil,” and that somehow protecting ones life, family and property is unacceptable and improper. They have garbled the language to convince the uninformed that certain types of guns with benign, decorative features are equivalent to military weapons which must be excised from public ownership. Make no mistake, the ultimate goal of the Left is to completely disarm America, an aim the founding fathers adamantly opposed as a sure path leading to tyranny by the government elite.
The attempts to date have been less overt, but still chilling. Government “watch lists” prohibiting gun ownership have been created, with no accountability for how one ends up on such a list, and an impossible bureaucratic mess to be removed from it. The federal government has pushed banks to stop making loans to licensed gun dealers in order to make it impossible to run a retail gun business. And the perpetual call for more invasive and comprehensive “background checks” has been proposed, ensuring that when the government decides to round up all the guns, they will simply check their list and pay a visit to the homes of gun owners.
Super strict gun laws coming, page 2:
Fight the government with rifles. What will happen is you’ll be sitting there and all of a sudden you’ll be vaporized. Lets see what A. Scalia has to say: Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms. Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those “in common use at the time” finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons
One more you left out.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ATF_gunwalking_scandal
A big Facebook DISLIKE. I do not support this!
It can’t be enforced though and good luck convincing any cops to enforce it since cops and obongo are not on good terms, especially with the way the darks have been acting with their rioting. On off chance any cops and feds to try to enforce, I advocate making it risky for them to do so and they will eventually give up trying to enforce an illegal law anyway.
kill me first then you can have it
He swore to uphold the constitution impeach now!
Not in my state. In my state hr 4269 is illegal. Good luck with that.
We are not children whom obama can dictate what we can or cannot have , own , keep , sell , buy or trade.
Aww, isn’t make believe a fun game.
DO NOT COMPLY !