Barack Obama is in his last year as president. He has declared that his effort to “remake” this country means he will try his utmost to implement his most draconian and outrageous goals, one of which is the disarming of America. There is no other way to describe it, and Democratic lawmakers have bought into this absolutely unconstitutional objective, in spite of the objection of their constituents and their declaration to uphold the laws of the land when they were sworn into office.
They have worked hard to indoctrinate children in public schools to believe that guns are “evil,” and that somehow protecting ones life, family and property is unacceptable and improper. They have garbled the language to convince the uninformed that certain types of guns with benign, decorative features are equivalent to military weapons which must be excised from public ownership. Make no mistake, the ultimate goal of the Left is to completely disarm America, an aim the founding fathers adamantly opposed as a sure path leading to tyranny by the government elite.
The attempts to date have been less overt, but still chilling. Government “watch lists” prohibiting gun ownership have been created, with no accountability for how one ends up on such a list, and an impossible bureaucratic mess to be removed from it. The federal government has pushed banks to stop making loans to licensed gun dealers in order to make it impossible to run a retail gun business. And the perpetual call for more invasive and comprehensive “background checks” has been proposed, ensuring that when the government decides to round up all the guns, they will simply check their list and pay a visit to the homes of gun owners.
Super strict gun laws coming, page 2:
Nope
Don’t stir up the paranoids – please. Congress isn’t going to do anything – as usual.
If you read the entire sentence of the amendment (and not just the phrase you like), it appears it is open to interpretation. So far, I don’t think (could be wrong) SCOTUS hasn’t decided to rule on what is meant by “in order to maintain a well regulated militia.”
Why do ppl need a Ford f350 when a Chevy s10 can get u around? Why do ppl need subwoofers that blows holes in your ear drums? Nobody NEEDS those excessive things….personal preference…so if I like an ar-15 with a 30 round banana MAGAZINE (which is what the non ghetto slang term actually is) over a hand gun with a 17 rdagazine then so be it. If I want to shoot my friends machine gun for target practice I’ll do that too. This is NOT A CHRISTIAN NATION IT IS AN OVER-INDULGENT CAPITALIST one. I have an unalienable RIGHT to bear ANY firearm I want. Everything else is just a privilege.
I was being sarcastic at the beginning. If you want a high cap. Mag then get a permit that requires a background check etc.
My son got a letter from school about “safety at home.” In the letter, it states that there should never be a gun in the home. If a gun is needed, then it should be kept in a locked container meant for guns (preferably a gun safe), and kept in a garage. In a garage? Keep it where you can’t get to it, but it is easier access for criminals. Thanks by the way to the state of Illinois for telling my child that guns are “bad.” Even he knew this was stupid.
Silencers, fully auto, already need a stamp. No need for 30 round mags to need a stamp. The terrorist attack in Cali was carried out with 10 round mag compliant weapons. Its not how many bullets, it’s the Intent.
Or an axe a knife or hammer
that is the most vague bill I ever read!!!! no definitions at all……ignore it is my view!
I say since they keep attacking our rights why don’t we go ahead restructure our government because I’m personally sick of paying all these taxes (40% on my commission) for them to violate their oaths to office. Why pay for a service we are not getting ?