Barack Obama is in his last year as president. He has declared that his effort to “remake” this country means he will try his utmost to implement his most draconian and outrageous goals, one of which is the disarming of America. There is no other way to describe it, and Democratic lawmakers have bought into this absolutely unconstitutional objective, in spite of the objection of their constituents and their declaration to uphold the laws of the land when they were sworn into office.
They have worked hard to indoctrinate children in public schools to believe that guns are “evil,” and that somehow protecting ones life, family and property is unacceptable and improper. They have garbled the language to convince the uninformed that certain types of guns with benign, decorative features are equivalent to military weapons which must be excised from public ownership. Make no mistake, the ultimate goal of the Left is to completely disarm America, an aim the founding fathers adamantly opposed as a sure path leading to tyranny by the government elite.
The attempts to date have been less overt, but still chilling. Government “watch lists” prohibiting gun ownership have been created, with no accountability for how one ends up on such a list, and an impossible bureaucratic mess to be removed from it. The federal government has pushed banks to stop making loans to licensed gun dealers in order to make it impossible to run a retail gun business. And the perpetual call for more invasive and comprehensive “background checks” has been proposed, ensuring that when the government decides to round up all the guns, they will simply check their list and pay a visit to the homes of gun owners.
Super strict gun laws coming, page 2:
Nope, the only thing illegal is this bill, the ones proposing, or enforcing it!
Bs.will not comply.
Kelly if the law is against the law then we must disobey it.
There is no limit in the Constitution. It say “arms”. Get a dictionary.
Sorry….just not gonna happen!
All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void
(Marbury vs. Madison. 5 US (2 Cranch) 137,174,176, (1803)
Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be
no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them.
(Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436 p.491.)
An Unconstitutional Act is not law; it confers no rights:
it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no
office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though
it had never been passed. (Norton vs. Shelby County 118 US 425 p.442)
“There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of his
exercise of constitutional rights.”
Simmons v. United States, 390 U.S. 377 (1968)
“The claim and exercise of a Constitution right cannot be converted
into a crime”… “a denial of them would be a denial of due process of law”.
Warnock v. Pecos County, Texas., 88 F3d 341 (5th Cir. 1996)
Thanks Bev I didn’t think of them at first but I have fireplace poker, shovel they would make good weapons
Wish Kris Kyle was till here, There are no other as professional as he. Barrack had him killed I think.
This is a Democrat only bill. If Paul Ryan plays by Democrat rules, he doesn’t even have to take it up in the House. He can just put it aside the way Pelosi and Boehner did w/ more conservaticve bills. Any legislation to gun laws is unconstitutional anyway. We have laws in the books we all know they don’t stop criminals.
Nazism plain and simple