There is more scientific proof suggesting Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition than the resulting fires from the debris.
A new scientific study found the official story surrounding 9/11 was not compatible with the laws of physics. Several studies have already reached similar conclusions. However, this is the 1st to provide the long-awaited definitive answers.
The new study conducted at the University of Alaska Fairbanks took things one step further – we now know with a high degree of scientific accuracy that the official NIST explanation of how the World Trade Center 7 building collapsed is not only suspect, it’s 100% false, according to the findings of this academic study.
This study replicated and remodeled every factor relating to that infamous day involving building 7. Complete study results and the undeniable scientific evidence indicating Building 7 was a deliberate job on the next page:
b******t
Thank God, finally a structural engineering genius weighs in !
Two conspiracy theorists. Idiot, the rubble was thoroughly tested and no explosive residues were found by multiple teams and multiple different entities
Jimmy Smith, your comment is useless. It doesn’t explain anything.
It’s about time this was addressed. The destruction of these buildings didn’t follow logic or engineering standards.
Hey, Bill checked your profile. You look CIA or some other 3 letter spook agency.
Perry Pridgen, I could call you an$#%&!@*fuckface scumbag dickbreath cocksucker, but I won’t, even though you called me an idiot. Know why? Because I’ve got class, that’s why. Betcherasss.
By the way, who are “they”?
So wee the other two.Bush could tell you why.
Here ya go, pigeon man:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.globalresearch.ca/the-mysterious-collapse-of-wtc-seven/15201/amp
Sorry man people are crazy