There is more scientific proof suggesting Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition than the resulting fires from the debris.
A new scientific study found the official story surrounding 9/11 was not compatible with the laws of physics. Several studies have already reached similar conclusions. However, this is the 1st to provide the long-awaited definitive answers.
The new study conducted at the University of Alaska Fairbanks took things one step further – we now know with a high degree of scientific accuracy that the official NIST explanation of how the World Trade Center 7 building collapsed is not only suspect, it’s 100% false, according to the findings of this academic study.
This study replicated and remodeled every factor relating to that infamous day involving building 7. Complete study results and the undeniable scientific evidence indicating Building 7 was a deliberate job on the next page:
Wrong
Duh; it was failure of the steel due to high temperatures.
Yeah, shire that’s what happened
Bunch of fanatical idiots here; nothing that happened there after the planes hit was unusual; steel failure from intense heat and pancaking once the collapse started. All basic fire science. Don’t be fooled by attention whores.
The fuel didn’t melt it dipshit, it weakens it and coupled with the damage brought on by the impact, the weight of the upper floors just was more than the beams could handle!
Sure they were idiot
B******t
It was dropped two days later moron
Same way foreign born Barry satero got ID AND. A SS # from a state he never lived in and went to collage on a foreign visa
Bull effing$#%&!@* Liar