There is more scientific proof suggesting Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition than the resulting fires from the debris.
A new scientific study found the official story surrounding 9/11 was not compatible with the laws of physics. Several studies have already reached similar conclusions. However, this is the 1st to provide the long-awaited definitive answers.
The new study conducted at the University of Alaska Fairbanks took things one step further – we now know with a high degree of scientific accuracy that the official NIST explanation of how the World Trade Center 7 building collapsed is not only suspect, it’s 100% false, according to the findings of this academic study.
This study replicated and remodeled every factor relating to that infamous day involving building 7. Complete study results and the undeniable scientific evidence indicating Building 7 was a deliberate job on the next page:
B******t
Blah blah blah blah
Jay Norman you look like a fool, they pulled out engines and landing gear and more from the pentagon … strike one
Nobody said the jet fuel and building materials burnt hot enough to melt the beams, but if you had the education of a sixth grader you’d know that structural steel CAN be weakened with heat, considering how much structural damage occurred at impact and how much weight from above was bearing on heat stressed beams over several floors. It’s not like the one floor can get squished and the downward momentum would stop right there… strike two
And here’s the heat, you dumbass, you’d have to run 100’s of thousands of feet of det chord
The United States government has been lying to the public since July 1947….Possess no illusions of this….The reasoning is quite understandable in economic terms….
B******t
Lmfao retarded
Eat c**p wackjob
Thank you mom, she tripped and knocked it all down
Bunch of bored people creating make-believe scenarios for the sake of attention.
Latest I heard is, you’re loaded