There is more scientific proof suggesting Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition than the resulting fires from the debris.
A new scientific study found the official story surrounding 9/11 was not compatible with the laws of physics. Several studies have already reached similar conclusions. However, this is the 1st to provide the long-awaited definitive answers.
The new study conducted at the University of Alaska Fairbanks took things one step further – we now know with a high degree of scientific accuracy that the official NIST explanation of how the World Trade Center 7 building collapsed is not only suspect, it’s 100% false, according to the findings of this academic study.
This study replicated and remodeled every factor relating to that infamous day involving building 7. Complete study results and the undeniable scientific evidence indicating Building 7 was a deliberate job on the next page:
Physics… something moving at a higher velocity with enough mass behind it can in fact do catastrophic damage despite being a less dense material… now if you aren’t an engineer either, let me explain plane structure on most planes. The reason you sit above the wing is because under your$#%&!@*in the cabin the wings are connected… they are a solidly secured. Add these two things together and you have enough to do damage. Now for jet fuel won’t melt steel… alright… in an open area if you poured it on steel and lit it up no it would not. Now add in that a majority of the fire was in an enclosed area… where temperatures will rise significantly higher… it may not have melted away the main framework steel. but it sure as hell destroyed all the concrete and rebar… still with me? The added weight and stress on the inside of the building isn’t what that was designed to handle… That’s how the damage was done that caused the first one to go… Now if you thing an impact at that speed into a building didn’t have debris come down and do damage as well as the first tower dropping doing damage… You can only mitigate so much of that debris. Ask any demolition expert that works in major building demos… they’ll tell you it’s very plausible for a building that size coming down with only the width of a street and a sidewalk… Yeah that can cause damage and structural weaken adjacent buildings… especially if they have also happened to start on fire from the collapsing burning building…
WHAT IN THE HELL ATE YOU PEOPLE SMOKING ???
Bill Dietzmann, if YOU know anything at all about murderers, you’d know they can do things right in front of you, and you wouldn’t see it. I’ve researched this. I know what I’m talking about. There were white trucks going to the buildings during the night, with crews strategically placing the bombs, during the week before 9/11. Here’s something you probably DON’T “know.” There was a large vault full of gold bars in the basement of one of the towers. That’s where eye/ear witnesses heard the first explosion. People came out of the elevators, and into the lobby with flames on their bodies, and pieces of flesh falling off. In my opinion, the gold had already been removed from the vault, and this first explosion was intended to hide the fact that the vault was robbed. Chemicals were used to heat up, and weaken the steele beams in all areas of the structure of the buildings in order to ensure they would fall straight down into their own footprints, in order to destroy all evidence. People think nothing of periodical inspections of work environments. That is exactly what happened prior to 9/11. Several structural “safety” inspections, (during which employees were informed they could not access certain areas at that time) occurred in both towers in the few days leading up to the event. Before you try to tell me what I “DON’T know,” do some research, so you #might have a chance of #appearing as if you DO know #something.
BS
It’s common knowledge, moron. Building 7 was brought down 2 days after the attacks, because it was so heavily damaged from the towers coming down.
Lisa clear something up for me just how strong is aluminum and glad as that is what the exterior of the towers were made of. Enlighten me with your knowledge of these buildings and the effect of a jetliner crashing into them. Enlighten me with your knowledge of what an explosion and a raging fire burning at 1850 degrees and what effect that had on those towers. I will be patiently waiting for your idiotic response
You’re a dumbass
Yeah so how’d they run all the det chord and place the charges at every structural beam without cutting out the walls throughout every building ? You ef tards think about any way to say what’s real didn’t happen but you’re to damned stupid to realize what you’ve heard from other asshats could never have happened without everyone seeing it ! Dipshits
CH Lawns those are all lies
I’ve heard of some stupid theories but these take the cake. The aircraft aluminum used in those aircraft are stronger than most steels, with their weight and speed, could have easily cut through to the interior if the building, that was designed to implode in on itself rather than take half the buildings around it out in case of a disaster. 737s carry 20,000 gallons of jet-A, which were fully loaded on takeoff, burns hit enough to easily collapse the building.