There is more scientific proof suggesting Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition than the resulting fires from the debris.
A new scientific study found the official story surrounding 9/11 was not compatible with the laws of physics. Several studies have already reached similar conclusions. However, this is the 1st to provide the long-awaited definitive answers.
The new study conducted at the University of Alaska Fairbanks took things one step further – we now know with a high degree of scientific accuracy that the official NIST explanation of how the World Trade Center 7 building collapsed is not only suspect, it’s 100% false, according to the findings of this academic study.
This study replicated and remodeled every factor relating to that infamous day involving building 7. Complete study results and the undeniable scientific evidence indicating Building 7 was a deliberate job on the next page:
Nobody, especially me, never said their were not any planes. What baseboard are you idiots crawling out of? A plane did not, however, hit the Pentagon. The damage does not support a plane hit. Too surgical and no wing hit marks. Hijackers, yes. My theory is a remote hack on the planes. No one has explained paper passports surviving. You probably all still believe theine gunman theory in the Kennedy assassination. Lol
most Americans thought this from the get-go
So was the towers
Horse manure post manufactured for a slow news day.
If you believe lee Harvey Oswald was the only shooter to the Kennedy assassibation thrn you are an idiot.
9/11 is gone, never forgotten. Let it rest in peace.
Is that why BUSH Dr act surprised
Got to call BS!!!
Y’all never stop do you???????
Thats what they have been saying since day one