There is more scientific proof suggesting Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition than the resulting fires from the debris.
A new scientific study found the official story surrounding 9/11 was not compatible with the laws of physics. Several studies have already reached similar conclusions. However, this is the 1st to provide the long-awaited definitive answers.
The new study conducted at the University of Alaska Fairbanks took things one step further – we now know with a high degree of scientific accuracy that the official NIST explanation of how the World Trade Center 7 building collapsed is not only suspect, it’s 100% false, according to the findings of this academic study.
This study replicated and remodeled every factor relating to that infamous day involving building 7. Complete study results and the undeniable scientific evidence indicating Building 7 was a deliberate job on the next page:
every building was a controlled demolition! jet fuel can’t melt steel… only thermite can.
So were the twin towers – no building is going to collapse straight down like that except by controlled demolition explosions………the airplanes were just the excuse they needed to explain it away.
Tina sorry but the words pull it are not used as a term for imploding a building you said any one with experience will tell you that well as someone with experience I’m telling you that you don’t know a damn thing about what you are talking about and also since there were a total of fifteen buildings that were completely destroyed that day in New York please tell me just how were they destroyed
I think it was, after declared unsafe
yeah, the Bildeburgers did it and they escaped on black helicopters lent to them by the Freemasons, who have a secret base in Atlantis. And it is Don Trump’s fault
I guess all the people on the ground that saw the planes hit the buildings are part of the conspiracy. All the people that died on the planes part of the conspiracy, all the people that planted the explosives, part of the conspiracy. Yeah, all those people have kept their secret. Conspiracy theorist losers, please explain that one.
The building in London was not built the same way as the towers. What spread the fire in London were the retrofitted insulating panels which by the way are banned from use in the United States due to them being a fire hazard. Also the towers were built to 1936 building codes which was the code in use in New York at the time the towers were built. As far as building 7 it he’d a twelve foot wide gaze on one side that went one quarter of the way into the building and went through ten stores causing major structural damage. Two other parts of the building sustained major structural damage. The roof structure sustained major structural damage. A fire burned in that building that was fed by the diesel tanks that were in that building to power the generators. That building collapsed it was not blown up. Wake up
B******T !!!
Thats my point idiot. Towers were built strong with steel. Apt house burned for 24 hours without collapsing. See the difference??
Tim Leach , careful you might have a supply and demand problem. The loons are really out in force today.