There is more scientific proof suggesting Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition than the resulting fires from the debris.
A new scientific study found the official story surrounding 9/11 was not compatible with the laws of physics. Several studies have already reached similar conclusions. However, this is the 1st to provide the long-awaited definitive answers.
The new study conducted at the University of Alaska Fairbanks took things one step further – we now know with a high degree of scientific accuracy that the official NIST explanation of how the World Trade Center 7 building collapsed is not only suspect, it’s 100% false, according to the findings of this academic study.
This study replicated and remodeled every factor relating to that infamous day involving building 7. Complete study results and the undeniable scientific evidence indicating Building 7 was a deliberate job on the next page:
Do not trust the Government version at all.
Bullcrap
We’re do you guys get this c**p. There are no conspiracy theories if you want to fall for that make the all these people all his money on his book deals or at ahead
Not trying to throw water on the fire of controversy here, but there are an estimated 2.5 million architects in the world and a estimated 6.9 million engineers/scientists in the US. So 3,000 is not overwhelming number to base a solid conclusion on. While planes struck the other structures, Building 7 is the anomaly here and bears more research for sure.
Bull S
Did you even go to the site to look at the evidence, of course not but I’m sure you’ll take Popular Mechanics word for it.
Don’t know for sure but too many things don’t add up, esp. Bldg. 7
You’re an idiot. Apparently you and your neighbor know nothing about the laws of physics and momentum. A fully loaded plane can weigh more than half a million pounds. Those planes didn’t “slice” the structural steel, their momentum bent it out of the way.
Absolutely.
Ok, I am now seriously starting to believe the conspiracy theorist. Frightening.