There is more scientific proof suggesting Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition than the resulting fires from the debris.
A new scientific study found the official story surrounding 9/11 was not compatible with the laws of physics. Several studies have already reached similar conclusions. However, this is the 1st to provide the long-awaited definitive answers.
The new study conducted at the University of Alaska Fairbanks took things one step further – we now know with a high degree of scientific accuracy that the official NIST explanation of how the World Trade Center 7 building collapsed is not only suspect, it’s 100% false, according to the findings of this academic study.
This study replicated and remodeled every factor relating to that infamous day involving building 7. Complete study results and the undeniable scientific evidence indicating Building 7 was a deliberate job on the next page:
Mark Wedemann.dont ever approach me like that again faggot
And those willing to give up liberty for safety deserve neither and will lose both. Ben Franklin
Those building were designed to withstand impact of airplanes…
You get off the drugs you simple minded fool
Our gover helped dumbass Mark Wedemann
All three were then
You are a good little tool…
The fact that the BBC reported the collapse of Building 7 a full 20 minutes before it happened certainly makes me wonder-
it didnt take me 2 years to know that it was ovious
3 buildings falling at free fall speed.. that’s pretty amazing..