There is more scientific proof suggesting Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition than the resulting fires from the debris.
A new scientific study found the official story surrounding 9/11 was not compatible with the laws of physics. Several studies have already reached similar conclusions. However, this is the 1st to provide the long-awaited definitive answers.
The new study conducted at the University of Alaska Fairbanks took things one step further – we now know with a high degree of scientific accuracy that the official NIST explanation of how the World Trade Center 7 building collapsed is not only suspect, it’s 100% false, according to the findings of this academic study.
This study replicated and remodeled every factor relating to that infamous day involving building 7. Complete study results and the undeniable scientific evidence indicating Building 7 was a deliberate job on the next page:
You saw exactly what they wanted you to see, and think what they want you to think
Wrong
Stay blind, doesn’t change the facts
Give that man a gold star. Refreshing to see someone gets it. I just know why many can’t put the pieces and facts together.
Joe Fleck it took me a few years of research to get it. It can’t be explained in a 2-3 minute text. Do some real research like we have.
Waste of money.. 5 minutes of film you can tell all the buildings were a demo
Ask bush
CIA, FBI, Bank of America… all in bld 7
Apt house in London high rise over the summer burned for over 24 hours.. Never collapsed. Wtc burned for 30 minutes.. Down to the ground. Building 7 was never hit. Still it crumbled. Wake up ⏰
You saw building 7 hit by a plane? That’s news. You have pictures of that?