There is more scientific proof suggesting Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition than the resulting fires from the debris.
A new scientific study found the official story surrounding 9/11 was not compatible with the laws of physics. Several studies have already reached similar conclusions. However, this is the 1st to provide the long-awaited definitive answers.
The new study conducted at the University of Alaska Fairbanks took things one step further – we now know with a high degree of scientific accuracy that the official NIST explanation of how the World Trade Center 7 building collapsed is not only suspect, it’s 100% false, according to the findings of this academic study.
This study replicated and remodeled every factor relating to that infamous day involving building 7. Complete study results and the undeniable scientific evidence indicating Building 7 was a deliberate job on the next page:
Linda Kruse Stewart your retarded literally retarded I cant believe people like you are allowed to walk the streets
So was twin towers
Horst, really? Explain then the ‘free fall’ of the buildings in 10 seconds? A pancake effect would have created resistance as each floor hit the floor below, taking at least another 10 seconds?
The one in the field was supposed to hit the pentagon but never made it that’s why they had to hit it with a Missile
You’re retarded
You’re retarded
I believe this!!!!!!!!!!!!
I..watched..the live broadcast…….of the second tower rammed by an airliner. Period.
B******t
Karl Minor exactly.