There is more scientific proof suggesting Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition than the resulting fires from the debris.
A new scientific study found the official story surrounding 9/11 was not compatible with the laws of physics. Several studies have already reached similar conclusions. However, this is the 1st to provide the long-awaited definitive answers.
The new study conducted at the University of Alaska Fairbanks took things one step further – we now know with a high degree of scientific accuracy that the official NIST explanation of how the World Trade Center 7 building collapsed is not only suspect, it’s 100% false, according to the findings of this academic study.
This study replicated and remodeled every factor relating to that infamous day involving building 7. Complete study results and the undeniable scientific evidence indicating Building 7 was a deliberate job on the next page:
I refuse to believe these conspiracy theories. Sorry.
Bravo Sierra
It always amazes me how people can look at a set of words and see what they want to see and not see what is actually written there.
CNN at it again
Liberal idiots
No$#%&!@*..it’s been obvious from day one.
they all were!
most ppl knew it was bs the day it happened .. but we are just the regular people and have no real voice
media gives us all our opinions
Building 7 had been prepared for implosion be fore 9/11 and had thus being weakened ..but the tremor by the collasping WTC towers brought it down sooner