There is more scientific proof suggesting Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition than the resulting fires from the debris.
A new scientific study found the official story surrounding 9/11 was not compatible with the laws of physics. Several studies have already reached similar conclusions. However, this is the 1st to provide the long-awaited definitive answers.
The new study conducted at the University of Alaska Fairbanks took things one step further – we now know with a high degree of scientific accuracy that the official NIST explanation of how the World Trade Center 7 building collapsed is not only suspect, it’s 100% false, according to the findings of this academic study.
This study replicated and remodeled every factor relating to that infamous day involving building 7. Complete study results and the undeniable scientific evidence indicating Building 7 was a deliberate job on the next page:
Get a life……………….
Bull$#%&!@*
Idiot conspiracy nuts running amuck. Truth avoids them like the plague
One word, b******t!
Delusional! Inside job?? The stupidest thing ever stated. Just stupid.
This can only the other buildings were not taken down by Saudis… ???
DUH
9/11 was a Bush/CIA Inside Job False Flag Attack
Roy Wayne Yes, with the space between the outer skeltal beans of the WTC, the fuselage would pass through, breaking the glass and even bending the beans. We, my neighbor and I, were addressing the wings slicing through the outed beams.
And I no doubt that planes were used in the attack but I believe there is something else going on that we do not know. I too knew some people who died that day.
Purdue University engineers did a study and verified that the plane and fuel blowing up was enough to take the building down.
Again… I dont deny that the planes were use and that the planes (with their jelly like fuel) caused a caustic flammable mess. I’m just questioning how an aluminum wing can cut steel.