There is more scientific proof suggesting Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition than the resulting fires from the debris.
A new scientific study found the official story surrounding 9/11 was not compatible with the laws of physics. Several studies have already reached similar conclusions. However, this is the 1st to provide the long-awaited definitive answers.
The new study conducted at the University of Alaska Fairbanks took things one step further – we now know with a high degree of scientific accuracy that the official NIST explanation of how the World Trade Center 7 building collapsed is not only suspect, it’s 100% false, according to the findings of this academic study.
This study replicated and remodeled every factor relating to that infamous day involving building 7. Complete study results and the undeniable scientific evidence indicating Building 7 was a deliberate job on the next page:
YES, AND BUSH KNEW
Loose Change, In Plane Site, Scholars for the Truth.
Okay I’ll probally be visited in the middle of night so I’ll present this as a (I thought I heard it somewdhere) type of statement
But I heard between 9 and 11 floors were owned by the cia and were wired for a control cleaned if ever breached.
Remember above ( )
No. It wasn’t. Please.
They made a fortune off of that$#%&!@*
Planes may have hit that building but did not bring them down.
Who did the Study?
So who blew up up, detective. I know what I saw I saw 2 aircraft go into both towers. The others i don’t know I wasn’t on the ground.
But why would they want to bring the buildings straight down? Why not knock them over? Would have done more damage wouldn’t it?
And many people thought they watched the moon landing. Lol.