There is more scientific proof suggesting Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition than the resulting fires from the debris.
A new scientific study found the official story surrounding 9/11 was not compatible with the laws of physics. Several studies have already reached similar conclusions. However, this is the 1st to provide the long-awaited definitive answers.
The new study conducted at the University of Alaska Fairbanks took things one step further – we now know with a high degree of scientific accuracy that the official NIST explanation of how the World Trade Center 7 building collapsed is not only suspect, it’s 100% false, according to the findings of this academic study.
This study replicated and remodeled every factor relating to that infamous day involving building 7. Complete study results and the undeniable scientific evidence indicating Building 7 was a deliberate job on the next page:
These buildings were all controlled demonlitioned. My cousins an architect and does these for a living. 150% these were taking down deliberately.
Tom I’m sure it’s awkward being one of the only men that are actually buying into this b******t.$#%&!@*blew up his own Reichstag federal buildings to get funding for war like we did.
Bullshitbullshitbullshit
The beams were even cut at a parrell angle which is what they do to control demo any high rise.
Yea, right, sure. ….prove it. Not a single shred of actual evidence to back up your imagination!
Jim Damanski again my brother SENIOR FDNY HAZMAT was in the edifice whose basement contained items seized by the NYPD and was a storage for other inflammatory materiel. there was no evidence of any explosion device in 7 or tower basements. what is so hard to understand about this and why is anyone doing any computer simulation. I am so sick and tired of all u arm chair know it alls. There is exactly ONE FDNY employee who was there that day and in aftermath who thinks something was ‘fishy”. The heat generated by the planes was sufficient to melt steel and one of the engineers involved in original project concurred saying if they had been permitted to use insulated asbestos it would have held. This was in an article in New Yorker soon after event. If you are unable to understand this i will ask someone who was there to explain it to you more simply
I can’t believe so many fucking idiots actually believe some monkey in a hole across the world blew up all these buildings.$#%&!@*was controlled demolitioned…$#%&!@*did the same thing to his own Reichstag federal buildings to get funding for war. & to get people to want to fight……
Jim Damanski PS my bro can explain where your understanding of “physics” is faulty also
Only bush can answer what happened under his watch noticed how calm he was thorough out the whole event ! And why did we need Homeland security after this ? Like$#%&!@*and his gestspo !
F**e news what are you trying to gain I saw it all go down on TV