There is more scientific proof suggesting Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition than the resulting fires from the debris.
A new scientific study found the official story surrounding 9/11 was not compatible with the laws of physics. Several studies have already reached similar conclusions. However, this is the 1st to provide the long-awaited definitive answers.
The new study conducted at the University of Alaska Fairbanks took things one step further – we now know with a high degree of scientific accuracy that the official NIST explanation of how the World Trade Center 7 building collapsed is not only suspect, it’s 100% false, according to the findings of this academic study.
This study replicated and remodeled every factor relating to that infamous day involving building 7. Complete study results and the undeniable scientific evidence indicating Building 7 was a deliberate job on the next page:
Psychos
F**E NEWS!
The findings thus far are that fire did not bring down this building. Building failure simulations show that, to match observation, the entire inner core of this building failed nearly simultaneously
Tom Seiler, running wires I’d old school. Wireless detonation isn’t. Both buildings were under construction for months prior to the event….
Karl Minor, it was only “proven” with computer simulation. Obviously that can be manipulated unlike an actual working model. For the first time in history there was no actual working model made because they know it’s impossible for the top smaller portion of the building to push through the remaining ridged bottom part… It’s physics
The fits tower opened in December 1970, the second in 1972…..I seriously doubt they were still under construction on 9/11.
Central Bank the Federal Reserve System is one evil piece of c**p
It took a two year study to to try and find a way to tell us this was all b******t. I knew that years ago!
Heat weakens steal . It did not melt it collapsed.
F**e news