There is more scientific proof suggesting Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition than the resulting fires from the debris.
A new scientific study found the official story surrounding 9/11 was not compatible with the laws of physics. Several studies have already reached similar conclusions. However, this is the 1st to provide the long-awaited definitive answers.
The new study conducted at the University of Alaska Fairbanks took things one step further – we now know with a high degree of scientific accuracy that the official NIST explanation of how the World Trade Center 7 building collapsed is not only suspect, it’s 100% false, according to the findings of this academic study.
This study replicated and remodeled every factor relating to that infamous day involving building 7. Complete study results and the undeniable scientific evidence indicating Building 7 was a deliberate job on the next page:
Two-year study on top of the other 14 years and we still know that radical Islam did September 11th!
How did those light poles stay standing at the plane flew through and where was the wreckage of the plane
Thanks… I’ll accept that as a complement, James!
If this is so about bldg. 7, what about the others?
What really happens to steel buildings when they burn; they just gut out.
Carl Milan The Las Vegas shootings never happened either.
Well no$#%&!@*
Anyone that believes planes brought these buildings down will s2ollow just about anything the govment tells them.
The tower’s destruction is all Bush and Cheney, they needed that new Pearl Harbor so they could invade Iraq.
I love the video that shows the plane come out the other side of the tower from where it supposedly went in and had its no second completly intact. Considering the planes no second is fiberglass, I find that a little against science !!
Jim Goodrow Even if what you say is true, that still wouldn’t explain why they were still uncovering molten steel eight weeks later! Neither do you provide an explanation for building 7!
I will take the results of a PHD Structural Engineer over anything the government says or pays for. http://ine.uaf.edu/projects/wtc7/