There is more scientific proof suggesting Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition than the resulting fires from the debris.
A new scientific study found the official story surrounding 9/11 was not compatible with the laws of physics. Several studies have already reached similar conclusions. However, this is the 1st to provide the long-awaited definitive answers.
The new study conducted at the University of Alaska Fairbanks took things one step further – we now know with a high degree of scientific accuracy that the official NIST explanation of how the World Trade Center 7 building collapsed is not only suspect, it’s 100% false, according to the findings of this academic study.
This study replicated and remodeled every factor relating to that infamous day involving building 7. Complete study results and the undeniable scientific evidence indicating Building 7 was a deliberate job on the next page:
Well it’s a shame you can’t explain how BOTH black boxes were never found from those planes. Only time EVER.
No way in he’ll was that building brought down with controlled demolition, the amount of work it takes to bring down a building that size would require months of obvious drilling, Jack hammering and pre weakening of ALL support columns, it requires heavy equipment for this and you’re gonna tell me none of the people who work there saw any of this supposed work? Lay off the pipe people!!!
Human remains haven’t been found now that’s a shame really.
so the thousands of people who saw a big$#%&!@*plane hit the towers are all full of$#%&!@*grow
I heard it took three days to take down no 7.
It was both. Air plane drew attention to the top of building while the charges below brought the building straight down.
Oh, puhleeze!
You and your damned halfbaked conpericy bologna.
B******t
You have to study it for two years so you may state the obvious with an overwhelming sense of discovery, you must be a special kind of stupid.