There is more scientific proof suggesting Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition than the resulting fires from the debris.
A new scientific study found the official story surrounding 9/11 was not compatible with the laws of physics. Several studies have already reached similar conclusions. However, this is the 1st to provide the long-awaited definitive answers.
The new study conducted at the University of Alaska Fairbanks took things one step further – we now know with a high degree of scientific accuracy that the official NIST explanation of how the World Trade Center 7 building collapsed is not only suspect, it’s 100% false, according to the findings of this academic study.
This study replicated and remodeled every factor relating to that infamous day involving building 7. Complete study results and the undeniable scientific evidence indicating Building 7 was a deliberate job on the next page:
You know 50% percent of American population have an IQ of less than 100. You can’t be rational with them.
already knew is was govt that caused it yrs ago, u honestly think people that they wouldnt do somthing like this….cant u see how outta control they are
What a crock !!!
Ed Brookens You keep saying “the beams were cut” and a whole bunch of other nonsense that you saw “on the news”. Yeah, ok, but you conveniently omit any reference to what particular news report, and you say firemen said this and saw that, but haven’t substantiated one single allegation you’ve posted. You obviously don’t have so much as a single ounce of engineering experience or even basic knowledge if you think random beams can be sawed half way through and not collapse almost immediately under the weight of the building they’re supporting. You can’t even compromise a bearing wall in a single family home without buckling roof rafters. Please just stop posting. Your idiocy is painful to watch.
How can a plane go through steel when a bird strike almost destroys it ?
Have any of you conspiracy numnuts ever seem magnesium get hot enough to ignite and burn? Didn’t think so.
That’s exactly what I been saying
Ellen Danielson Dittbrender If you have ever seen controlled demolitions and then watched the towers come down, absolutely no difference… In fact, you can even see the charges go off most of the way down!!! Your theory that jet fuel can melt 100,000 tons of steel in one hour is not a good one…
Carl Mac What do you think would happen? That a jet flying hundreds of miles per hour would impact the Twin Towers and bounce off of them? By the way, that photo doesn’t show a plane that was “almost destroyed”.
Hank Ridings – nothing funny about it. Look it up. It’s real. I am lucky to have Architects in my life. I see nothing humorous about 9/11.