There is more scientific proof suggesting Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition than the resulting fires from the debris.
A new scientific study found the official story surrounding 9/11 was not compatible with the laws of physics. Several studies have already reached similar conclusions. However, this is the 1st to provide the long-awaited definitive answers.
The new study conducted at the University of Alaska Fairbanks took things one step further – we now know with a high degree of scientific accuracy that the official NIST explanation of how the World Trade Center 7 building collapsed is not only suspect, it’s 100% false, according to the findings of this academic study.
This study replicated and remodeled every factor relating to that infamous day involving building 7. Complete study results and the undeniable scientific evidence indicating Building 7 was a deliberate job on the next page:
John Kerry admitted it years ago….
bolton
The architect design World Trade Center to fall in what is referred to as a pancake — straight down one floor on top of the other like a stack of pancakes. Never read or heard the architect said can withstand multi plane impacts. The jet fuel burned so hot it melted the structural steel.
Duh
Hey Tom you mentioned you were a military responder. The military responders did not show up until it was time to start cleaning up. Unless you just happened to be in New York at the time. But again if you are a military responder then you know what I’m saying is true
Sounds like it was planned and that is very scary that someone here in America might have done it.
Pete Iatrou – and Full of Jet Fuel
Let’s see the just after pics of the tower first before we go Wild!!!
Yep!
Whi might have been in them? …clintins collusinists?..yhat needed to keep quiet?..lol