There is more scientific proof suggesting Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition than the resulting fires from the debris.
A new scientific study found the official story surrounding 9/11 was not compatible with the laws of physics. Several studies have already reached similar conclusions. However, this is the 1st to provide the long-awaited definitive answers.
The new study conducted at the University of Alaska Fairbanks took things one step further – we now know with a high degree of scientific accuracy that the official NIST explanation of how the World Trade Center 7 building collapsed is not only suspect, it’s 100% false, according to the findings of this academic study.
This study replicated and remodeled every factor relating to that infamous day involving building 7. Complete study results and the undeniable scientific evidence indicating Building 7 was a deliberate job on the next page:
Timothy Taft your a moron nothing you said was true get your head out of obamas ass
Utter b******t.
Silly
tards
tard
Duh!!! How come it takes some people so long to figure things out?? That is a two month plan and the building was laying on the ground around five o’clock!! Lol. The charges were already planted!!
Bull$#%&!@*alert.
Jim Goodrow Force of entry plus elevated heat made 100,000 tons of steel melt like butter in an hour – Are you the stupidest Liberal on the planet… or is there someone more brain-dead than you?
It’s B******t, not true!!
Baloney