There is more scientific proof suggesting Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition than the resulting fires from the debris.
A new scientific study found the official story surrounding 9/11 was not compatible with the laws of physics. Several studies have already reached similar conclusions. However, this is the 1st to provide the long-awaited definitive answers.
The new study conducted at the University of Alaska Fairbanks took things one step further – we now know with a high degree of scientific accuracy that the official NIST explanation of how the World Trade Center 7 building collapsed is not only suspect, it’s 100% false, according to the findings of this academic study.
This study replicated and remodeled every factor relating to that infamous day involving building 7. Complete study results and the undeniable scientific evidence indicating Building 7 was a deliberate job on the next page:

Anyone who seriously believes it was an inside is a moron anyways theres no talking them
anybody with half a brain knows just from watching them fall that they were all controlled demolitions.
Oh please ! Not everything is a conspiracy. There are plenty, this just isn’t one of them.
You people need aluminum hats to keep Martian rays off your heads
This picture is no proof of anything other than a horrific terrorist attack.
As were ALL the buildings. The fact that they were able to bamboozle that many Americans by this still amazes the hell out of me. They are STILL trying to pull$#%&!@*on us (think Las Vegas shooters) BUT more people thankfully are starting to wake up.
thay all were.
Oops…………..
And the one in shanksville
I’ve always thought that. I’m telling you, when you look at the video of it’s collapse, it does not look like the towers when they fell. The towers had debris falling outward and they fell from the top down. When you look at bldg 7’s collapse, it is pristine on the top and middle floors, and falls from the bottom up in a perfect footprint of the bldg. Bldg 7 is an anomaly within that whole crisis.