There is more scientific proof suggesting Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition than the resulting fires from the debris.
A new scientific study found the official story surrounding 9/11 was not compatible with the laws of physics. Several studies have already reached similar conclusions. However, this is the 1st to provide the long-awaited definitive answers.
The new study conducted at the University of Alaska Fairbanks took things one step further – we now know with a high degree of scientific accuracy that the official NIST explanation of how the World Trade Center 7 building collapsed is not only suspect, it’s 100% false, according to the findings of this academic study.
This study replicated and remodeled every factor relating to that infamous day involving building 7. Complete study results and the undeniable scientific evidence indicating Building 7 was a deliberate job on the next page:
Ca you say, “Collateral damage”, boys and girls?
Thanks to Obama
F**e news seems to work for you… You can’t handle the TRUTH!!!
Bullsh**.
Vegas reminds me of 911
I guess the people on the one plane lied to family on what was going on then. You also forgot that when Clinton was in office they tried to blow them up but failed. You bet they had people inside, like they do now. They have people in places such as airports, military our government. But 911 was terrorist. You people just want to think it’s our government an not Islamic crazy people.
Yes, but you can’t instantly pull it… It takes weeks to prepare a building for a controlled demolition, not hours!!! And here, you have a demolitions crew standing by just in case 911 happens?
I saw it too I agree
I can only assume the people that did the study have no eyes
B******t…