There is more scientific proof suggesting Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition than the resulting fires from the debris.
A new scientific study found the official story surrounding 9/11 was not compatible with the laws of physics. Several studies have already reached similar conclusions. However, this is the 1st to provide the long-awaited definitive answers.
The new study conducted at the University of Alaska Fairbanks took things one step further – we now know with a high degree of scientific accuracy that the official NIST explanation of how the World Trade Center 7 building collapsed is not only suspect, it’s 100% false, according to the findings of this academic study.
This study replicated and remodeled every factor relating to that infamous day involving building 7. Complete study results and the undeniable scientific evidence indicating Building 7 was a deliberate job on the next page:
Gerald Maynes what I wrote is a fact. Stick that tin foil hat up your$#%&!@*
Yes, but what now. The cowards that committed this act will never let the truth come out. We’ve seen it all before and NOTHING ever changes. End the Fed!!
It was agreed on tv to demolish it due to damage. Saw it myself. OYYYYYY!
Derp!
Ok we know it was all planned but who? NWO
Gerald Maynes So, your little Bergen Community College education landed you a job working for Quaker Oats and then a supervisor at a market… Me bets yous iz varry intelijents!!!
My take is that you’re right… All 3 were controlled demolitions!!!
Does it prove who did ti?
Shawn Prokash There’s a lot more at play with a tornado than things being thrown at great speeds or carried for many miles – Tornadoes can also affect the structural integrity of a building…
And what plane did you SEE fly into Tower 7?