There is more scientific proof suggesting Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition than the resulting fires from the debris.
A new scientific study found the official story surrounding 9/11 was not compatible with the laws of physics. Several studies have already reached similar conclusions. However, this is the 1st to provide the long-awaited definitive answers.
The new study conducted at the University of Alaska Fairbanks took things one step further – we now know with a high degree of scientific accuracy that the official NIST explanation of how the World Trade Center 7 building collapsed is not only suspect, it’s 100% false, according to the findings of this academic study.
This study replicated and remodeled every factor relating to that infamous day involving building 7. Complete study results and the undeniable scientific evidence indicating Building 7 was a deliberate job on the next page:
Did you go out side with your aluminum foil hat on?
Fucking morons
Something to think about. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFJa9WUy5QI
Mike Farrar A fellow officer fell asleep and ran into a small tree at approximately 35mph, killing him instantly – So, if he had been driving at 500mph, his car would have gone through the tree… Really? I have to pull my B******T card on that one – Each tower was over 100,000 tons of steel, not counting the concrete and aluminum planes fly right through that… Really? And then, no matter where the plane hits, the steel forgets that it is steel and melts to the ground like butter? Thanks for your physics lesson…
All 3 were !
I said this when I seen the building go down.
F**e news!
Well said Jack Mcfadden
No doubt about it. It was a conspiracy. Bush should hide.
All 3 were brought down by controlled demolition.