There is more scientific proof suggesting Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition than the resulting fires from the debris.
A new scientific study found the official story surrounding 9/11 was not compatible with the laws of physics. Several studies have already reached similar conclusions. However, this is the 1st to provide the long-awaited definitive answers.
The new study conducted at the University of Alaska Fairbanks took things one step further – we now know with a high degree of scientific accuracy that the official NIST explanation of how the World Trade Center 7 building collapsed is not only suspect, it’s 100% false, according to the findings of this academic study.
This study replicated and remodeled every factor relating to that infamous day involving building 7. Complete study results and the undeniable scientific evidence indicating Building 7 was a deliberate job on the next page:
Paul I have worked in the construction industry for forty years. I have overseen the construction of schools, hospitals, shopping malls, multi story office buildings hell I have even built a very large bomb shelter, and a long list of other things. I have overseen projects where buildings were brought down by controlled demolition. Never in my entire forty year career have I heard the words pull or pull it as term referring to controlled demolition. I have heard just about every crazy conspiracy theory there is when it comes to 9/11. It’s all a complete bunch of b******t. You say a building will not collapse due to fire well your completely wrong. There was a skyscraper in California that caught fire and finally collapsed it was a steel frame building. You say all this stuff is on the internet then I would imagine that there would be information out there that is actually correct I would suggest that you look for that information instead of reciting the same old wore out theories that give other conspiracy theories for references. You are totally wrong on pretty much everything you have said.
Loretta Beltrame Tellier well yea , the guys working ground had all those intelligence meeting
Ridiculous
Crock of$#%&!@*!!!!
Loretta Beltrame Tellier well yea , all the guys working ground zero had all those intelligence meetings, all were structural engineers Lol
All explosives leave a residue, none was found, no explosives were used! You don’t know what you’re talking about, go away!
Why “idiots” ?
Silly !
Because you people don’t have a brain of your own.
And also what could have created multon hot steel pools that where still liquid over a week after the buildings collapsed?
Thermite strapped to the columns in a 45 degree angle so when simultaneously ignited would cause the building to slide and fall to the basement floor causing enough force to collapse the buildings.
You really should take the time see all the odd evidence that all the buildings were demoed. The airplane that we were told hit the World Trade Center was a United Airlines plane but the motor of one of the planes was a Boeing engine no remains of the United Airlines planes or found to back up that claim but yet they found a Boeing engine which is the same as what you would find in a military plane. Or what about how George Bush was happened to be at Elementary School to read children’s books that morning and when he was told that the buildings were attacked he sat there like he didn’t know what to do next and he was waiting for instruction on what to do next you can see the guilt in his eyes that he knew what was going on before he was even told. He’s haunted bye the people who died from this and the people who died at War over this to the point where he is going nuts painting portraits of fallen heroes. Bush has painted over 200 paintings, kinda obsessive don’t ya think? Our nations debt holder was wanting war so this was thier plan to get us all mad and wanttùù