The past year or so have not been good ones for the charlatans promoting the climate change/global warming hoax. More scientists are stepping forward to present alternative views while some researchers are finding huge discrepancies in the data used to promote the scam.
President Donald Trump’s bold decision to not sign on to the Paris climate agreement is yet another breach in the climate change wall erected by globalists interested in redistributing wealth.
The mainstream media aid and abet the climate change hoax by not reporting stories that run counter to the agreed narrative.
Meanwhile, world-class hypocrite Al Gore is out promoting his latest nutty documentary to a global audience that’s tired of his obnoxious bloviating. Gore’s problem is most of the dire warnings he hyped in his first film have turned out to totally preposterous and laughable.
Even the most gullible among his acolytes are starting to see the magnitude of the con he’s promoted. They also see how his lifestyle runs counter to everything he preaches.
Now comes word of a scientific report that blows one of his key messages to smithereens. On the next page, learn how NASA, once a reliable partner in the hoax, has changed its tune on a major tenet of climate change.
I’m not worried about global warming but I’m not real happy about global pollution, it’s real and dangerous to the planet.
Santanna Bradshaw
What do you make of this? I’ve always thought climate change was b******t myself…. the climate is changing yes, but there isn’t$#%&!@*we can do about it. Climate is always changing
Let me know if you glass overflows into the counter.
Mr Sperry, does the majority of the ice on the planet rest on land or in the oceans?
This is a b******t article on a b******t website. Just reading the article you can tell it is c**p by the writing. Also, the story is just damn lazy. They are quoting from another b******t website instead of even doing thier own bullshitting.
The article is based on an article at SHTFplan.com. If you click on the links there, which they bet you won’t do, it doesn’t back up the article’s data analysis.
The guy below you, Aaron Armstrong, is pretty good but click the links and judge for yourself on the data Nasa is providing.
Hugo Canizales Felipe Yossell Andujar
I have to laugh over all of the comments on here from people who no idea what they are even talking about. People who obviously didn’t even look at the data. Do yourself a favor, stop reading b******t propaganda “News” from places like this.
Look at the data yourself, check the sources. Check the bias of the site. I wouldn’t trust a word Truthandaction.org says.
Places to stay away from:
Occupy Democrats
Now to REALLY blow your minds!! How many jobs are associated with clean energy vs fossil fuels … lets have a look
Almost 3.4 million!! And fossil fuels?? Hmmm. Odd we are fighting over coal jobs which account for 160 K jobs vs green energy production which is growing at 18%
every drop of water that has ever existed is still here on thr planet,except what ever has been taken up in space craft