The past year or so have not been good ones for the charlatans promoting the climate change/global warming hoax. More scientists are stepping forward to present alternative views while some researchers are finding huge discrepancies in the data used to promote the scam.
President Donald Trump’s bold decision to not sign on to the Paris climate agreement is yet another breach in the climate change wall erected by globalists interested in redistributing wealth.
The mainstream media aid and abet the climate change hoax by not reporting stories that run counter to the agreed narrative.
Meanwhile, world-class hypocrite Al Gore is out promoting his latest nutty documentary to a global audience that’s tired of his obnoxious bloviating. Gore’s problem is most of the dire warnings he hyped in his first film have turned out to totally preposterous and laughable.
Even the most gullible among his acolytes are starting to see the magnitude of the con he’s promoted. They also see how his lifestyle runs counter to everything he preaches.
Now comes word of a scientific report that blows one of his key messages to smithereens. On the next page, learn how NASA, once a reliable partner in the hoax, has changed its tune on a major tenet of climate change.
There are super powerful computer models used to predict weather and I smile when the “Weather Channel” displays all the hurricane models and the lines go all OVER the place yet we’re to believe these long term models…I took statistics in graduate school and I’m greatly suspect of them
The fish thing is utter b.s. , cut off your arm and have it tested for mercury, they’ll tell you don’t eat yourself…
According to PEA website, most species of fish are contaminated anywhere from trace levels to harmful to children and pregnant women.
EPA.
Also note, paraphrased-Don’t have time to debate
Thanks to democrats for doing nothing but lining their pockets
Very civil conversation. I actually saw this on the news.
Not for long. Evaporation would make it saltier and saltier. Think Great Salt Lake.
I’m sorry but two data points do NOT MAKE A TREND! NASA should know this as there is at least one scientist working there.
There is no money in finding no changes in the environment. Activists want to scare people which helps to grant-fund “studies” paid for by taxes. Hundreds of thousands of jobs depend on keeping global warming nay-sayers from getting any publicity. Environmental propagandists have a lot to lose should they lose their momentum. I get a sense that they feel the scam is slipping away – losing ground as more legitimate earth science from sources like NASA paint an opposing view. No one is denying that people have created huge problems and these need to be fixed. Propagandists should cut the lies (like the oceans are rising) and address legitimate problems. There’s lots of money in cleaning up the oceans, waste water pollution etc. but the strong arming of tax payers by political hacks is not the way to do it.