The past year or so have not been good ones for the charlatans promoting the climate change/global warming hoax. More scientists are stepping forward to present alternative views while some researchers are finding huge discrepancies in the data used to promote the scam.
President Donald Trump’s bold decision to not sign on to the Paris climate agreement is yet another breach in the climate change wall erected by globalists interested in redistributing wealth.
The mainstream media aid and abet the climate change hoax by not reporting stories that run counter to the agreed narrative.
Meanwhile, world-class hypocrite Al Gore is out promoting his latest nutty documentary to a global audience that’s tired of his obnoxious bloviating. Gore’s problem is most of the dire warnings he hyped in his first film have turned out to totally preposterous and laughable.
Even the most gullible among his acolytes are starting to see the magnitude of the con he’s promoted. They also see how his lifestyle runs counter to everything he preaches.
Now comes word of a scientific report that blows one of his key messages to smithereens. On the next page, learn how NASA, once a reliable partner in the hoax, has changed its tune on a major tenet of climate change.
Scientist seem to go with the flow, of money. Give them more money and they can come up with the proof. That was payed for. As bad as politicians.
i was saying that government officials who are not scientists should not be running nasa and telling scientists what science is, this is what is happening, and they are using funding to force scientists to bend to their opinions, if you can not see this, you are blind
Rj Zimmer I’m not a climate expert either but I am a farmer. Your conclusion about CO2 begins with the assumption that the earth has no way to deal with carbon dioxide. But the earth is well equipped to handle the naturally occurring releases of it that far exceed mans output. Plants must have CO2, more CO2 means healthier plants converting ever more CO2 into oxygen which we need. The concentration of CO2 is very stable because of this built in regulation of gasses.
Can’t tell us where a hurricane is going to make landfall tomorrow but Al Gore can tell us what the temperature is going to be in a hundred years. Yeah that makes sense!
Thx for the eloquent response, kind of refreshing to not be called names. And I agree nature certainly absorb a certain amount of CO2. But I am going on the assumption that balance has been achieved through nature for millions if not billions of years. But human generated CO2 is not part of nature’s equation. Especially when one considers the dramatic rise in human generated CO2 since the turn of the 20th century as the global plant life is steadily reduced. I don’t know the ratio but I expect a rain forest converts a lot more CO2 than does a farm.
You do however make a good counter point.
Hey Leo.
If anyone bothered to read the data the authored referenced it does not support his argument. The oceans are rising. https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/sea-level/
The data he referenced does not support the argument. The graph and the data show the oceans rising. I figured most of the people believing this author only read the headline and faulty argument w/o checking the reference. Did you bother Gerry? https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/sea-level/
Sea level rise is caused primarily by two factors related to global warming: the added water from melting ice sheets and glaciers and the expansion of sea water as it warms. The first graph tracks the change in sea level since 1993 as observed by satellites.
The second graph, derived from coastal tide gauge data, shows how much sea level changed from about 1870 to 2000.
Learn more
NASA Sea Level Change
SATELLITE DATA: 1993-PRESENT
Data source: Satellite sea level observations.
Credit: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
RATE OF CHANGE
3.4 millimeters per year margin: ±0.4
199520052015TIME020406080
Sea Height Variation (mm)
Get Data: FTP | Snapshot: PNG
GROUND DATA: 1870-2000
Data source: Coastal tide gauge records.
Credit: CSIRO
data graph
Explore
Eyes on the Earth
Eyes on the Earth
Global Ice Viewer
Global Ice Viewer
Images of Change
Images of Change
Climate Mobile Apps
Climate Mobile Apps
Climate Time Machine
Climate Time Machine
Eyes on the Earth
Eyes on the Earth
Global Ice Viewer
Global Ice Viewer
Images of Change
Images of Change
Climate Mobile Apps
Climate Mobile Apps
MORE MULTIMEDIA
Get the Newsletter
enter email address
Stay Connected
twitter facebook instagram rss
Facts
Evidence
Causes
Effects
Scientific Consensus
Vital Signs
Questions (FAQ)
Articles
News
Features
Blog
Fun Facts
Solutions
Mitigation and Adaptation
Government Resources
Energy Innovations
Explore
Images of Change
Earth Minute Videos
Interactives
Mobile Apps
Beautiful Earth Gallery
Resources
Graphics and Multimedia
For Educators
Climate Kids
Global Warming vs. Climate Change
NASA Science
Science Mission Directorate (external)
Earth System Science
Earth Science Missions
History
ABOUT US | FEEDBACK | AWARDS | EARTH OBSERVATORY | SEA LEVEL CHANGE | PRIVACY | CLIMATE DATA INITIATIVE | U.S. CLIMATE RESILIENCE TOOLKIT
This website is produced by the Earth Science Communications Team at
NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory | California Institute of Technology
Site Editor: Holly Shaftel
Site Manager: Randal Jackson
Senior Science Editor: Laura Tenenbaum
Site last updated: August 10, 2017