Should Sharia law supersede the Constitution? This question was asked by Fox News contributor David Webb in a Islamic cultural center in New York and many responded yes, Sharia should supersede the Constitution.
The reason given is that the Constitution is man made and Sharia is from Allah.
Video on page two is troubling, but it is important to understand the significance of this view point.
Yes they believe that !!!
Nobody gives a hairy rats behind what any Muslim thinks about anything here in the United States. They do not belong here they cannot assimilate they cannot simply blend in they cannot live in our society ! Send them all back to their sandboxes
Help Trump help us turn in illegals
Most illegals do I bet!
Whoosh
They believe it does , we need to show them it doesn’t…
THATS NOT WHO WE ARE , DONT LIKE IT LEAVE , WE DIDNT ASK YOU TO COME HERE GO BACK TO YOUR HELL HOLE
If they started to deport Muslims because Every single Muslim in America would have to be deported. Why you might be think???
Because every single Muslim in America has say they want Sharia Law over the Constitution or they are not Muslims in the Arabic World
of course these animals but here in usa it doesnt and never will
I’m truly disgusted with the lack of understanding of the Constitution, especially in regard of the events and history of the time that influenced it. It’s specifically states in the Constitution that Jews and Turks would not root and rule in this country because of the unfairness of the laws. No one ever teaches the Constitution in full nor the first amendment. Yes free speech, yes free press but “freedom of religion” is misconstrued, a ninth amendment violation. Freedom of religion means our “secular” government will not be ruled by religion, meaning free from, without religion and the government had nothing to do with interfering in worship. When religion and practitioners violate law, you answer to the law here, regardless of you religion.