A Muslim man was welcomed to modern times after slapping a girl who refused to dance with him. Usually, when a woman doesn’t want to dance with a man, he leaves her alone, because, well, sometimes no means no. Apparently in the Middle East, no can be changed to yes with a slap to the face. As this guy learned the hard way, he’s not in the Middle East.
The video below takes place at some sort of celebration dance, where the Muslim man grabbed the hand of a girl, who refused to dance with him. So he slapped her, and she wasn’t okay with that, which is completely understandable.
Move to the next page for the video:
How did
TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT
You go girl.
That is exactly what we need to do to all of the Muslim scum!!!
Thank you for advising me of this requirement.
You’re upset about the Trump supporter who groped a 16 year old girl then pepper sprayed her?
Then you apply that label to all Trump supporters right?
You wouldn’t want to be inconsistent with you non PC agenda. That or you’re racist.
You’re upset about the Trump supporter who groped a 16 year old girl then pepper sprayed her?
Then you apply that label to all Trump supporters right?
You wouldn’t want to be inconsistent with you non PC agenda. That or you’re racist.
Derek Persevere Park, I agree. Don’t put your hands on a woman. But the point is, this is not a Muslim man in the video. The caption was falsified just for publicity. It’s becoming a common trend these days.
You have your circles of ideology with no room for any other view, that’s the bottom line. It’s not a matter of fact and never has been. I could probably elicit an argument from you people against bacon and blowjobs if I tried hard enough, acted like my personal feelings were at stake or somehow involved Brown People. You have one way, one interpretation of situations which were at best, recorded as well as could be managed by someone on a hillside with a feather. There are firsthand accounts but how many of the soldiers in the 10th-14th century carried personal logs? Or were even LITERATE? I’m not claiming to know any immutable facts that happened for sure beyond what was recorded and even then the info is suspect. The only thing I’ve been trying to get across from the start? Is that neither do you. Just like you don’t know for yourself the intentions of the people who are in no way involved in terror simply because of the name of the religion they subscribe to. There have been horrible deeds carried out in the name of almost every single religion on the planet, so we can ALL stop playing “victims,” by Aaron’s rationale.
And Peter? It might help convince me that you know more about comparative world religion and spiritual texts than I do if you could SPELL the title of the work you’re claiming to know so much better than I do.
For the record, I was born and raised Christian, which taught me to put myself in the shoes of others and to treat others the way I would like to be treated. Which, like everyone else, I fall WAY short of being a perfect student of. As we all fall short of the expectations we have of ourselves and the tenets we try to keep according to what each of us believes. I can’t, however, accept or believe that Jesus, were he here, would be complicit or accepting of people spreading hate and feeling not only justified but good about it, and patting each other on the back because they’ve managed to turn millions against an entire religion because of the actions of MAYBE 5% of that religion’s followers. And 5% is a generous figure, it’s closer to 1%.
There, I’ve had my closing words, continue with the bashing, I may need some laughs when we eventually end up back on wartime-rationing systems. I’ll check back with you, if only by snail mail, and see how “AWESOME!,” you think showing your patriotism through spreading Hate and War is.