As we proceed into an exciting new year and a potentially game-changing presidential administration, we find ourselves wading into new territory that raises challenging questions about our beliefs and ideas.
This of course isn’t necessarily a bad thing. After all, the mark of a good idea is that it has been subjected to numerous challenges and still remains intact. In fact, this is the essence of conservativism, respecting solid ideas that have stood the test of time while discarding ones that have been shown to be unfounded or dangerous. It is for this reason that we should be constantly evaluating the efficacy of our positions.
If we do not, we run the very serious risk of boxing ourselves into contradictory positions when two or more of our stances conflict with each other and giving a chance to characterize conservativism as a whole as the product of muddled thinking.
Turn to the next page for more info:
How about after you kill the thugs then say I t was there fault that I had to shoot them, but that’s ok because they are dead and can’t hurt anyone else.
Right on !!!
B/S
So if a robber armed tries to rob them they cant shoot them but the robber can. Doesnt make sense
Who’s thinking up these laws?! Who ever they are, they need to be OFFED!
How is it a store owners fault for thug violence? If I have a gun in my store for protection, and it’s NOT a gun free zone, so other patrons can carry, how is it not their job to protect themselves?
Ok Linda I didn’t read the article, glad you clarified:) if I owned a business I would never have it gun free! People deserve the right to protect themselves:)
that makes perfect sense. Let’s hold car manufactures responsible for drunk driving, or silverware manufacturers responsible for obesity. This s silly.
It would seem, because it’s so outlandish. Plays on the reader’s emotion.
MORE BS