As we proceed into an exciting new year and a potentially game-changing presidential administration, we find ourselves wading into new territory that raises challenging questions about our beliefs and ideas.
This of course isn’t necessarily a bad thing. After all, the mark of a good idea is that it has been subjected to numerous challenges and still remains intact. In fact, this is the essence of conservativism, respecting solid ideas that have stood the test of time while discarding ones that have been shown to be unfounded or dangerous. It is for this reason that we should be constantly evaluating the efficacy of our positions.
If we do not, we run the very serious risk of boxing ourselves into contradictory positions when two or more of our stances conflict with each other and giving a chance to characterize conservativism as a whole as the product of muddled thinking.
Turn to the next page for more info:
WHAT?
i want to sue car makers for drunk drivers
That’s just one of the Stupidest things ever put forth , Who’s the Missouri Liberal Idiot that concocted this stupidity.
The people who should be held accountable for gun violence are the principal’s involved in it, not innocent bystanders to include the business owners. A sign doesn’t mean compliance. A sign doesn’t prevent any thing. A sign is just a statement.
Still bull$#%&!@* The customer removed their own right to defend themselves by entering private property that did not allow that protection on property. No one is forced to enter the private business.
B******t story
Got to be a democrat law.
That’s wrong every person is responsible for their grown$#%&!@*even 15 yr olds know right from wrong and should be punished as adult
WTF?
B******t idea and will never hold up. If you elect to enter a private business that does not allow guns, that’s your choice. You elected to disarm yourself by choosing to enter the private property.