As we proceed into an exciting new year and a potentially game-changing presidential administration, we find ourselves wading into new territory that raises challenging questions about our beliefs and ideas.
This of course isn’t necessarily a bad thing. After all, the mark of a good idea is that it has been subjected to numerous challenges and still remains intact. In fact, this is the essence of conservativism, respecting solid ideas that have stood the test of time while discarding ones that have been shown to be unfounded or dangerous. It is for this reason that we should be constantly evaluating the efficacy of our positions.
If we do not, we run the very serious risk of boxing ourselves into contradictory positions when two or more of our stances conflict with each other and giving a chance to characterize conservativism as a whole as the product of muddled thinking.
Turn to the next page for more info:
If you read the page you’d know that’s exactly what this law is for.
Ahh lol oops
That’s fine. A smart man doesn’t need to use a gun. There are plenty of ways to take someone out if you have a bit of ingenuity. Taser, anyone?
I got a better idea. Let’s make anti 2nd amendment politicians liable for gun violence.
Nice,
Nice areal bill protecting law abiding citizens. It should be nation wide.
Propaganda bull s**t
B******t..
WTF, you get robbed by Thugs and get punished by the State? Who cares about a civilian good Samaritan doing the shooting? That is only establishing that business as a ‘Gun Free Zone’ which will only invite Thugs to rob it!
Read the bill( law) people.