Thanks to liberal activist judges, the state of Massachusetts has now become the testing ground of radical legal theories inspired by the controversial Black Lives Matter.
Like any number of states in the country, Massachusetts became the site of controversy back in 2011 when police arrested an African-American man identified only as Warren and a companion of his. Citing the fact that both Warren and his associate were wearing clothes that matched the description of criminal suspects, officers attempted to detain them only for the two men to try and flee. Eventually, law enforcement apprehended them and after carrying out a search, discovered Warren had an unregistered gun on his person.
After he was convicted of unlawful possession of a firearm, Warren sued the police and argued that they had no right to detain him. Incredibly enough, the Massachusetts Supreme Court sided with Warren, saying that not only did Warren have a right to flee from police, but any black citizen would have had the right to.
Turn to the next page for more info:
Running is good training for the NFL.
“You have the right to remain silent, you have the right to run from us, you have the right to be shot in the back…”
Either that or civil war 2.0
This is a backdoor attempt to eliminate the problem.
What Bull Manure it shows the mentality of the leftest/Lerbertards based on a 0.013% of Police Brutality you cancontinues to blame the Police for all the problems but the atrocity is that 96% of the Shootings, stabbings, beatings, and murders in the American Male of African descent is done by American Males of African Descent this is where you make the differance a differance that will also limit even further the numbers of Police Brutality cases.
Just get more shot idiots must be run bye the dems
Do the police have the right to run after them?
Donald L. Gigante hey donald ; if someone was running away from the police after killing someone ;would it be ok to shoot ; or only if it;s your kid ?
Oh this is great are you just asking for them to get shot???
Mass Supreme Ct should not be allowed to make these kind of decisions— replace them