Thanks to liberal activist judges, the state of Massachusetts has now become the testing ground of radical legal theories inspired by the controversial Black Lives Matter.
Like any number of states in the country, Massachusetts became the site of controversy back in 2011 when police arrested an African-American man identified only as Warren and a companion of his. Citing the fact that both Warren and his associate were wearing clothes that matched the description of criminal suspects, officers attempted to detain them only for the two men to try and flee. Eventually, law enforcement apprehended them and after carrying out a search, discovered Warren had an unregistered gun on his person.
After he was convicted of unlawful possession of a firearm, Warren sued the police and argued that they had no right to detain him. Incredibly enough, the Massachusetts Supreme Court sided with Warren, saying that not only did Warren have a right to flee from police, but any black citizen would have had the right to.
Turn to the next page for more info:
Who wrights this shit5
You knuckleheads. They just ruled that cops shouldn’t shoot perpetraters in the back .
What$#%&!@*would rule this lmao
But only during live moving target practice.
That gives the police the right to shot them.
Crazy world we are becoming
Well usually criminals or guilty people of races run from the police when they don’t want to get caught.
This is asinine!!! Are we sure these judges attended law school and ever really practiced law in a courtroom?
Then I guess the police have a right to slow them down
Run be shot.