Thanks to liberal activist judges, the state of Massachusetts has now become the testing ground of radical legal theories inspired by the controversial Black Lives Matter.
Like any number of states in the country, Massachusetts became the site of controversy back in 2011 when police arrested an African-American man identified only as Warren and a companion of his. Citing the fact that both Warren and his associate were wearing clothes that matched the description of criminal suspects, officers attempted to detain them only for the two men to try and flee. Eventually, law enforcement apprehended them and after carrying out a search, discovered Warren had an unregistered gun on his person.
After he was convicted of unlawful possession of a firearm, Warren sued the police and argued that they had no right to detain him. Incredibly enough, the Massachusetts Supreme Court sided with Warren, saying that not only did Warren have a right to flee from police, but any black citizen would have had the right to.
Turn to the next page for more info:
Wht the hell are you liberal judges thinking this is just plain STUPIDITY
Run$#%&!@* you’ll just die tired!
Yep. And if they have committed crimes just like whites, Browns, yellows, etc., they get the right to be shot. Move on. Idiots.
Liberalism run amuck… well if cop says run or I’ll shot, oh well…
If Police officers cannot bring Criminals to justice black or white or in-between. In this case Blacks are allowed to run from the law, what happens if a white person runs from the law?
If a crime(robbery,rape,murder) is taking place is and I’m Armed I’d shoot to kill.
And, you jerks can run to a sanctuary City to hide and play,cause you damn well won,t work
The Police have the right to chase after them especially when they just committed a robbery. If they hurt in the process, who told to run in the first place
If I were ‘the cops’, we would strike.
Then the only recourse for the police I see is to shot them before they can run, white ,black or other.
Then shooting is legal as well