Thanks to liberal activist judges, the state of Massachusetts has now become the testing ground of radical legal theories inspired by the controversial Black Lives Matter.
Like any number of states in the country, Massachusetts became the site of controversy back in 2011 when police arrested an African-American man identified only as Warren and a companion of his. Citing the fact that both Warren and his associate were wearing clothes that matched the description of criminal suspects, officers attempted to detain them only for the two men to try and flee. Eventually, law enforcement apprehended them and after carrying out a search, discovered Warren had an unregistered gun on his person.
After he was convicted of unlawful possession of a firearm, Warren sued the police and argued that they had no right to detain him. Incredibly enough, the Massachusetts Supreme Court sided with Warren, saying that not only did Warren have a right to flee from police, but any black citizen would have had the right to.
Turn to the next page for more info:
I hope this is f**e news.
Is this f**e? Unbelievable!
Totally stupid.
Do you realize that this graphic is grossly inaccurate and would have been easy to confirm with a simple google search, or do facts not matter? Not to mention that the original source of this “f**e news” is a neo$#%&!@*hitler admirer, or does that not matter either?
Why do they get all these privileges that we do not have?
“BLACK PRIVILEGE” What about whites & other people of colors ?
Apparently it is not f**e news. I saw the same thing from CNN as well. That being said, this ruling does seem pretty shady of the courts. I haven’t even seen the comments of others. I pay no attention to comments from people I don’t even know. What do you think of the ruling Christopher Kualii?
Then do police have the right to shoot them if they are running from a crime scene?
The dogs need exercise, no matter your race. Run away.
They may have the right to run but the police have the right to shoot them